Sylvain Goutelle

Imatinib is a targeted cancer therapy that has significantly improved the care of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, it has been shown that the recommended dosages of imatinib are associated with trough plasma concentration (Cmin) lower than the target value in many patients. The aims of this study were to design a novel model-based dosing approach for imatinib and to compare the performance of this method with that of other dosing methods. Three target interval dosing (TID) methods were developed based on a previously published PK model to optimize the achievement of a target Cmin interval or minimize underexposure. We compared the performance of those methods to that of traditional model-based target concentration dosing (TCD) as well as fixed-dose regimen using simulated patients (n = 800) as well as real patients’ data (n = 85). Both TID and TCD model-based approaches were effective with about 65% of Cmin achieving the target imatinib Cmin interval of 1000–2000 ng/mL in 800 simulated patients and more than 75% using real data. The TID approach could also minimize underexposure. The standard 400 mg/24 h dosage of imatinib was associated with only 29% and 16.5% of target attainment in simulated and real conditions, respectively. Some other fixed-dose regimens performed better but could not minimize over- or underexposure. Model-based, goal-oriented methods can improve initial dosing of imatinib. Combined with subsequent TDM, these approaches are a rational basis for precision dosing of imatinib and other drugs with exposure–response relationships in oncology.

Purpose: Vancomycin dosing remains challenging in patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis, especially in developing countries, where access to therapeutic drug monitoring and model-based dose adjustment services is limited. The objectives of this study were to describe vancomycin population PK in patients receiving hemodialysis in a Malian and French center and examine the optimal loading dose of vancomycin in this setting. Methods: Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using Pmetrics in 31 Malian and 27 French hemodialysis patients, having a total of 309 vancomycin plasma concentrations. Structural and covariate analyses were based on goodness-of-fit criteria. The final model was used to perform simulations of the vancomycin loading dose, targeting a daily area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of 400–600 mg.h/L or trough concentration of 15–20 mg/L at 48 hours. Results: After 48 hours of therapy, 68% of Malian and 63% of French patients exhibited a daily AUC of <400. The final model was a 2-compartment model, with hemodialysis influencing vancomycin elimination and age influencing the vancomycin volume distribution. Younger Malian patients exhibited a lower distribution volume than French patients. Dosing simulation suggested that loading doses of 1500, 2000, and 2500 mg would be required to minimize underexposure in patients aged 30, 50, and 70 years, respectively. Conclusions: In this study, a low AUC was frequently observed in hemodialysis patients in Mali and France after a standard vancomycin loading dose. A larger dose is necessary to achieve the currently recommended AUC target. However, the proposed dosing algorithm requires further clinical evaluation.