Umberto Maggiore

University of Parma
Country flag
Italy

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

LinkedIn
ORCID
Google Scholar

Articles (12)

More dissimilarities than affinities between DNAJB11-PKD and ADPKD

Background Polycystic kidney diseases (PKD) are an important cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) due to PKD1 or PKD2 mutations is the most common form, but other genes can be responsible for ADPKD and its phenocopies. Among them, a form of atypical ADPKD caused by DNAJB11 mutations (DNAJB11-PKD) has been recently described. Methods We retrospectively recruited a cohort of 27 patients from six different families sharing common ancestries and harboring the same DNAJB11 mutation (c.100C>T, p.Arg34*) and we compared it with a cohort of 42 typical ADPKD patients. Results DNAJB11-PKD patients show small/normal-sized kidneys, with significantly smaller cysts and a slower progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) than ADPKD patients. In the DNAJB11-PKD cohort, the cystic phenotype could not be detected by ultrasound in about half of the patients, but all cases with available computed tomography/magnetic resonance scans displayed cysts. Clinically, DNAJB11-PKD patients displayed proteinuria (mostly albuminuria). Compared with ADPKD, DNAJB11-PKD patients were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (19% versus 0%; P = 0.007) and nephrolithiasis (62% versus 29%; P = 0.01), whereas the prevalence of cardiac valvular defects was lower (4% versus 51%; P < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, clinical features of DNAJB11-PKD were more subtle compared with those of ADPKD. DNAJB11-PKD shows a unique renal and extrarenal phenotype, clinical presentation and natural history. Therefore our data support that this genetic disease is classified separately from ADPKD.

Year:

2022

Detecting, preventing and treating non-adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

Medication non-adherence (MNA) is a major issue in kidney transplantation and it is associated with increased risk of rejection, allograft loss, patients’ death and higher healthcare costs. Despite its crucial importance, it is still unclear what are the best strategies to diagnose, prevent and treat MNA. MNA can be intentional (deliberate refusal to take the medication as prescribed) or unintentional (non-deliberate missing the prescribed medication). Its diagnosis may rely on direct methods, aiming at measuring drug ingestions, or indirect methods that analyse the habits of patients to adhere to correct drug dose (taking adherence) and interval (time adherence). Identifying individual risk factors for MNA may provide the basis for a personalized approach to the treatment of MNA. Randomized control trials performed so far have tested a combination of strategies, such as enhancing medication adherence through the commitment of healthcare personnel involved in drug distribution, the use of electronic reminders, therapy simplification or various multidisciplinary approaches to maximize the correction of individual risk factors. Although most of these approaches reduced MNA in the short-term, the long-term effects on MNA and, more importantly, on clinical outcomes remain unclear. In this review, we provide a critical appraisal of traditional and newer methods for detecting, preventing and treating non-adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation from the perspective of the practising physician.

Year:

2022

Collaborators (4)

Gabriel Oniscu

Karolinska Institutet

SWEDEN

Ekamol Tantisattamo

Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine

University of California Irvine Medical Center

UNITED STATES

Wim Van Biesen

Ghent University Hospital

BELGIUM

Lucio Manenti

University of Parma

ITALY
Social connections

How do I reach out?

Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.

Meet Kite AI