Aldert Vrij

Academic, Professor, Professor of Social Psychology

University of Portsmouth

United Kingdom

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Professors in United Kingdom

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

About

Professor Aldert Vrij is a Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom. His research focuses on deception detection, forensic interviewing, and the cognitive processes involved in lie detection. Recent publications include studies on the effectiveness of interviewing techniques and the impact of cognitive load on interview quality.

Articles (27)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Collaborators (5)

Sharon Leal

University of Portsmouth

UNITED KINGDOM

View details

Lara Warmelink

University of Lancaster

UNITED KINGDOM

View details

Naoya Tabata

Associate Professor

Aichi Gakuin University

JAPAN

View details

Erik Mac Giolla

Associate Professor

University of Gothenburg

SWEDEN

View details

Timothy Luke

University of Gothenburg

SWEDEN

View details

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Aldert Vrij

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

About

Articles (27)

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection

The effect of the interviewer’s cognitive load on the quality of the forensic interview

Impacts of physical and testimonial evidence on South Korean police interrogator’s selection of tactics

Omission lies: the effect of omitting little or much information on verbal veracity cues

Veracity judgments based on complications: a training experiment

Introducing the high-context communication style interview protocol to detect deception in pairs

Verbal cues in omission lies: The effect of informing sources about the essential part of the event

Use of the model statement in determining the veracity of opinions

Successful use of the forced choice test for detecting concealment of semantic memory in criminal and intelligence investigations

“Tell me about your trip”: Introducing the Enhanced Ghostwriter Lie Detection Tool

The principle of reciprocity in Scharff interviews

To nod or not to nod: how does interviewer nonverbal behavior affect rapport perceptions and recall in truth tellers and lie tellers?

Exposing suspects to their sketches in repeated interviews to elicit information and veracity cues

In my opinion you are wrong! Adding a Model Statement to the Devil’s Advocate Approach to detect true and false opinions

Honesty repeats itself: comparing manual and automated coding on the veracity cues total details and redundancy

‘Drawing to conclusion’: the effect of sketching recall methods to enhance information‐gathering and cues to deceit

Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?

Eliciting veracity differences through a general memory recall test

Verbal Veracity Indicators and the Efficacy of Countermeasures in Three Non-WEIRD Populations

The relationship between Japanese adults’ age and self-reported verbal strategies when lying

Interviewing to detect omission lies

Verbal cues to deceit when lying through omitting information: examining the effect of a model statement interview protocol

All mouth and trousers? Use of the Devil’s Advocate questioning protocol to determine authenticity of opinions about protester actions

Interviewing to detect lies about opinions: the Devil’s Advocate approach

Linguistic concreteness of statements of true and false intentions.

Verbal lie detection: its past, present and future

A comparable truth baseline improves truth/lie discrimination

Collaborators (5)

Sharon Leal

Lara Warmelink

Naoya Tabata

Erik Mac Giolla

Timothy Luke

Make your next move.