Alexander Kupferthaler

Background: Serial analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels is a promising tool for both relapse prediction in the curative setting, as well as predicting clinical benefit from systemic treatment in metastasic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Most data in this context are derived from treatment naive patients. Objective: To predict progressive disease (PD) as early as possible through monitoring of changes in ctDNA levels during systemic treatment in pretreated patients with mCRC. Design: A prospective, single-center, observational study. Methods: Patients treated beyond first-line were prospectively included between February 2020 and September 2021. Blood for ctDNA detection was taken before every treatment cycle from start of treatment until first restaging by CT-scan. ctDNA was detected by mutation- (mut-ctDNA) and methylation-specific ddPCR. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-analysis was used to describe sensitivity and specificity for prediction of PD at restaging for all time points. Results: A total of 42 patients were included who all carried a mutation in tumor tissue. Detection rate of mut-ctDNA was 88.1% and 74.4% for meth-ctDNA. Absolute ctDNA levels before treatment were prognostic in terms of overall survival. Levels of ctDNA were significantly higher in patients with PD at restaging. Median time from start of treatment to restaging was 93 days (95% CI 88.8–96). After a median of 19 days of treatment (95% CI 16.1–20.2), a decline of either mutation- or methylation-specific ctDNA levels of ⩽58% predicted PD at restaging with a sensitivity/specificity of 92.9/85.7% and 85.7/100%, respectively. Median time to restaging was 66 days (95% CI 56.8–75.2). There was no significant increase of sensitivity/specificity at later time points of ctDNA measurements. Conclusion: Monitoring early changes of ctDNA levels either by mut- or meth-ctDNA allows for early prediction of PD in pretreated patients with mCRC. This has the potential to complement RECIST-based treatment assessment with the aim to switch potentially insufficient treatments as early as possible, which is of particular interest in higher treatment lines.

Purpose: In penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs), limited data support tubular thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as a viable treatment option. For treatment of more proximal PAUs, hybrid approaches and—more recently—scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) have been advocated. Outcomes of scTEVAR specifically for PAUs have not yet been reported. This study reports long-term outcomes for tubular and scTEVAR in PAUs and compares the safety profile in both cohorts regarding the significantly more proximal landing zone (LZ) for scTEVAR. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study includes all nonacute patients treated for complicated PAU with scTEVAR and tubular TEVAR. Patient and PAU characteristics as well as procedural success, complication and reintervention rates, and all-cause and aortic mortality were analyzed. Results: Of 212 TEVAR procedures reviewed, 21 patients with tubular TEVAR and 19 patients with scTEVAR were included. Patient and PAU characteristics were similar, and LZ was significantly more proximal in the scTEVAR cohort (p=0.0001), with similar number and types of supra-aortic revascularization procedures. Clinical success was reached in all 40 patients (100%), and reintervention rate was 2/21 (9.5%) and 1/19 (5.3%), respectively. Over the mean follow-up of 63 (TEVAR) and 53 (scTEVAR) months, clinical success was stable in all patients with one (abdominal) aortic-related mortality in the scTEVAR cohort. Conclusion: Treatment of complicated PAUs with TEVAR as well as scTEVAR provides excellent and similar clinical success, stability of clinical success, and aortic survival with acceptable complication and reintervention rates. Scalloped TEVAR safely lengthens the proximal sealing zone to address more proximal pathologies. Clinical Impact Treatment of asymptomatic complicated penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) provides excellent clinical success and acceptable complication and reintervention rates. More patients become amenable to endovascular treatment by including scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) as a means to safely lengthen the proximal sealing zone to address more proximal pathologies.