Alice Kongsted

Objectives To unpack the complexity and impact of self‐management interventions targeting musculoskeletal health conditions, we need to learn more about treatment delivery in clinical settings. Fidelity evaluation can illuminate how complex treatments are delivered and help understand the elements that lead to the effect. The objective of this study was to develop a checklist for the evaluation of the clinicians’ delivery of structured patient education and exercise intervention for people with persistent back pain, the GLA:D Back intervention. The intent was to provide a checklist adaptable for the general delivery of self‐management interventions for musculoskeletal pain. Methods We derived items for the treatment delivery fidelity checklist from behaviour change techniques and theory about communication style. We applied a three‐step developmental process covering developing a preliminary fidelity intervention framework , validating checklist content and piloting and refining the checklist. Results We developed the adaptable fidelity checklist, The GLA:D BACK Self‐management Adherence and Competence Checklist (SMAC Checklist). Evaluation of clinical practice using the checklist was feasible and acceptable by clinicians. Preliminary results indicate satisfactory observer agreement during pilot testing of the checklist. Conclusion The GLA:D BACK Self‐management Adherence and Competence Checklist is a fidelity measurement tool for the assessment of the delivery of a self‐management supportive intervention for people with persistent back pain. The intention is that it can be useful as an adaptable tool for use across self‐management interventions for musculoskeletal pain.