Alicja Dąbrowska-Kugacka

Medical University of Gdansk
Country flagPoland

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (14)

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

The distal transradial approach (dTRA) through the anatomical snuffbox is hypothesized to offer greater benefits than the conventional transradial access (cTRA) for patients undergoing coronary procedures. Our goal was to assess the safety and efficacy of dTRA. Out of 465 consecutive Caucasian patients, 400 were randomized (1:1) to dTRA or cTRA in a prospective single-center trial. Clinical and ultrasound follow-ups were obtained at 24 h and 60 days post-procedure. The primary combined endpoint consisted of access crossover, access-related complications, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included clinical success endpoints (puncture success, crossover, and access time), access-site complications endpoints, and MACE at 60 days. The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the dTRA [odds ratio (OR): 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–3.86, p = 0.001]. Clinical success endpoints, namely crossover (10% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.05) and access-time [median: 140s (85–322) vs. 80s (58–127), p < 0.001], did not favor the dTRA, despite a similar success rate in radial artery puncture between the dTRA and cTRA (99.5% vs. 99%). Radial artery spasm (19% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.0001), physical discomfort during access, and transient thumb numbness after the procedure occurred more frequently with the dTRA. However, early (2.5% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.41) and mid-term (2.5% vs. 3%, p = 0.98) forearm radial artery occlusion rates were comparable between the dTRA and cTRA. Randomization to the dTRA, lower forearm radial pulse volume, higher body mass index, and lower body surface area independently predicted the primary endpoint in multivariate analysis. In the interaction effect analysis, only diabetes increased the incidence of the primary endpoint with the dTRA (OR: 18.67, 95% CI: 3.96–88.07). The dTRA was a less favorable strategy than cTRA during routine coronary procedures due to a higher incidence of arterial spasm and the necessity for access crossover. The majority of local complications following the dTRA were clinically minor complications. Individuals with diabetes were particularly susceptible to complications associated with the dTRA.

Year:

2023

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Collaborators (9)

Rafał Gałąska

Lecturer

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Izabela Nabialek-Trojanowska

-

POLAND
View details

Michal Markuszewski

professor, head of department

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Damian Flis

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Zofia Lasocka-Koriat

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Grzegorz Sławiński

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Renata Wawrzyniak

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Ludmila Danilowicz-Szymanowicz

Professor/ Head of the Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy

Medical University of Gdansk

POLAND
View details

Ewa Lewicka

Consultant/Professor, MD PhD

Medical University

POLAND
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.