Catarina Eloy

Objective Interventional pathologists have expanded their expertise by acquiring proficiency in ultrasound‐guided thyroid fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and are now required to optimize punction procedures due to low resources and digital workflows. The aim of this study is to compare FNAB sample adequacy in two series with one versus two slides available for cytopathological analysis and its influence on diagnosis categorization, time taken to reach a final diagnosis, scanning time and size of the digital files produced. Methods Patients were retrospectively selected based on the sampling of thyroid nodules using either two glass slides (two‐slide group) or one slide only (one‐slide group) and cytological diagnosis was performed using the second edition of the Bethesda system. For each group, the initial 15 cases were sorted to be scanned. Results From a total of 713 procedures, 328 were sampled into two slides and 385 on one slide only. No significant differences were found regarding nodule size, location or EU‐TIRADS classification between the two groups. The one‐slide group did not exhibit a higher prevalence of non‐diagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) categories. As expected, the mean time taken to finalize diagnoses in cases where only one slide was prepared was 1.2 days faster. Scanning time and total file size were also significantly smaller in the one‐slide group. Conclusions Adopting the ‘one nodule–one puncture–one slide’ strategy for thyroid FNAB optimization enhances procedural efficiency in digital workflows, leading to cost savings without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

Cell blocks may be hard to be totally automatically detected by the scanner (ADS), generating incomplete whole slide images (WSIs), with areas that are not scanned, leading to possible false negative diagnosis. The aim of this study is to test if inking the cell blocks helps increasing ADS. Test 1: 15 cell blocks were sectioned, one half inked black (1HB) and the other inked green (1HG). Each of the halves was individually processed to generate a WSI stained by the H&E. 1HBs and 1HGs had similar scanning time (median 59 s vs. 65 s, p = .126) and file sizes (median 382 Mb vs. 381 Mb, p = .567). The black ink interfered less in the observation (2.2% vs. 44.4%; p < .001) than in the green one. Test 2: 15 cell blocks were sectioned, one half inked black (2HB) and the other left unstained/null (2HN). Each of the halves was individually processed to generate three WSIs—one HE, one periodic‐acid Schiff (PAS), and one immunostained by cytokeratin AE1&AE3 (CKAE1AE3). HE and PAS WSIs from both 2HN and 2HB groups were all totally ADS and had similar scanning times and file sizes. Concerning immunostaining with CKAE1AE3: ADS (46.7% vs. 93.3%; p = .014), median time for scanning (57 s vs. 83 s; p < .001) and file size (178 Mb vs. 338 Mb; p < .001) were reduced significantly in the 2HN group in comparison with the 2HB. Although increasing scanning time and file size, inking the cell blocks helps increasing ADS after immunostaining, improving the safety and efficiency of the digital pathology workflow.