Elisabeth Brogren

Background: The functional benefits of total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) over total wrist fusion (TWF) are unknown. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to compare TWA and TWF with respect to functional outcomes and activity limitations at up to 2 years postoperatively. Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, we enrolled all adult patients undergoing TWA or TWF for the management of symptomatic end-stage wrist arthritis at 1 hand surgery department. The primary outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, on motion, and on loading; grip strength; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH); and range of motion. Patients completed questionnaires and were examined by the same physiotherapist at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Mixed-model analyses adjusting for age, diagnosis, the preoperative value of the dependent variable, and time since surgery were performed to compare differences in PRWE scores, VAS pain scores, and grip strength between TWA and TWF. Results: Of the 51 patients who had been included at baseline, 47 (18 in the TWA group and 29 in the TWF group) responded to questionnaires and underwent examinations at up to 2 years postoperatively. At baseline, the 2 groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, diagnosis (inflammatory or noninflammatory arthritis), PRWE score, VAS pain score, grip strength, DASH score, or range of motion. No differences between the groups were found for the PRWE (β, −0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], −14 to 13; p = 0.99), VAS pain at rest (β, −3.3; 95% CI, −15 to 9; p = 0.58), VAS pain on loading (β, −5.3; 95% CI, −22 to 11; p = 0.52), or grip strength (β, −0.02; 95% CI, −0.18 to 0.14; p = 0.80) on the adjusted mixed-model analyses. Conclusions: Among patients with symptomatic end-stage wrist arthritis, those who underwent TWA did not demonstrate short-term outcomes, including patient-reported disability, pain, and grip strength, superior to those of patients who underwent TWF. These findings call into question the widespread use of TWA. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Ulna head arthroplasty has become an eligible solution for injury or disease in the distal radioulnar joint. Bone resorption beneath the prosthetic head is often reported, but mechanism poorly understood. Purpose The aims were to evaluate bone remodeling and radiological instability in two conceptually different distal radioulnar joint arthroplasties: the total and the partial ulna head replacement. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective radiographic assessment of 51 ulna head arthroplasties; 26 Herbert ulna (total ulna head replacement) and 25 First Choice (partial ulna head replacement), to analyze periprosthetic bone resorption and radiologic instability. Intraoperative/immediate postoperative and 1-year radiographs were reviewed by two independent assessors. The radiographic follow-up averaged 13 (10–17) months. The size of the stem in relation to the diameter of the ulna (filling ratio) was measured on the intraoperative/immediate postoperative radiographs. Bone resorption beneath the collar of the prothesis was measured on the 1-year radiographs and expressed as a bone resorption index (BRI) between the length of the resorption and the length of the implant stem. Radiological stability was measured on both the preoperative and the 1-year lateral radiographs. Results The total ulna head prothesis presented with more extensive bone resorption beneath the prosthetic head than the partial ulna head prothesis at 1-year post surgery (p <0.001). The filling ratio did not influence the 1-year bone resorption and there was no difference regarding radiological instability between the two prosthetic designs. Conclusion The pattern of bone adaptions after an ulna head prothesis may differ due to design and concept of the prosthesis.