Elizabeth M. Petty

Providing welcoming, inclusive, and culturally competent care is essential for genetic counselors (GCs) to serve the needs of all patients, including transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. Inclusive language creates welcoming healthcare spaces and improves health outcomes for TGNB individuals. Training on gender‐affirming healthcare can increase knowledge, comfort, and self‐efficacy working with TGNB patients. Using a mixed‐method survey, this study assessed 65 GCs' gender‐inclusive communication practices and elucidated reasons for discomfort using language to determine how language builds trust and fosters patient–provider relationships, ascertain differences between specialties, and identify potential gaps in education and professional development. This study found that approximately one‐third of GCs are comfortable using gender‐inclusive language and just over half regularly use it with patients. Most GCs do not share their pronouns or ask patients theirs, which was not correlated with comfort levels or frequency of using gender‐inclusive language. There were no significant differences based on specialty. Thematic analysis of open responses revealed GCs used gendered language to promote shared language and for clarity, some mentioning sex assigned at birth was relevant for risk assessment. Most felt the impact of gendered language depended on the patient's perspective. Twenty‐five percent noted gendered language was familiar for most patients and 40% recognized negative impacts on TGNB individuals. Most GCs desired more gender‐inclusivity training even though >95% had some type previously. Those who had gender‐inclusivity training in their genetic counseling program were more comfortable using gender‐inclusive language and were more likely to share their pronouns with patients. This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating GCs' desire for more gender‐inclusivity education and highlights the potential importance of having this education integrated into genetic counseling training programs. GCs should continue to incorporate gender‐inclusive language into their practice in concordance with the tenants of the Reciprocal Engagement Model.