Launch week offerEnds in00h00m00s

Emily J Griffith

Ohio State University
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

Articles (10)

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

We derive empirical constraints on the nucleosynthetic yields of nitrogen by incorporating N enrichment into our previously developed and empirically tuned multizone galactic chemical evolution model. We adopt a metallicity-independent (‘primary’) N yield from massive stars and a metallicity-dependent (‘secondary’) N yield from AGB stars. In our model, galactic radial zones do not evolve along the observed [N/O]–[O/H] relation, but first increase in [O/H] at roughly constant [N/O], then move upward in [N/O] via secondary N production. By t ≈ 5 Gyr, the model approaches an equilibrium [N/O]–[O/H] relation, which traces the radial oxygen gradient. Reproducing the [N/O]–[O/H] trend observed in extragalactic systems constrains the ratio of IMF-averaged N yields to the IMF-averaged O yield of core-collapse supernovae. We find good agreement if we adopt $y_\text{N}^\text{CC}/y_\text{O}^\text{CC}=0.024$ and $y_\text{N}^\text{AGB}/y_\text{O}^\text{CC} = 0.062(Z/Z_\odot)$. For the theoretical AGB yields we consider, simple stellar populations release half their N after only ∼250 Myr. Our model reproduces the [N/O]–[O/H] relation found for Milky Way stars in the APOGEE survey, and it reproduces (though imperfectly) the trends of stellar [N/O] with age and [O/Fe]. The metallicity-dependent yield plays the dominant role in shaping the gas-phase [N/O]–[O/H] relation, but the AGB time-delay is required to match the stellar age and [O/Fe] trends. If we add ∼40 per cent oscillations to the star formation rate, the model reproduces the scatter in the gas phase [N/O]–[O/H] relation observed in external galaxies by MaNGA. We discuss implications of our results for theoretical models of N production by massive stars and AGB stars.

Year:

2023

Collaborators (12)

Eileen Gonzales

Assistant Professor

San Francisco State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Jamie Tayar

University of Florida

UNITED STATES
View details

Keith Hawkins

University of Texas at Austin

UNITED STATES
View details

Jacqueline Faherty

Senior Scientist

American Museum of Natural History

UNITED STATES
View details

David Hogg

Group Leader

Flatiron Institute

UNITED STATES
View details

Elisabeth Newton

Assistant Professor

Dartmouth College

UNITED STATES
View details

Kathryn Johnston

Professor

Columbia University

UNITED STATES
View details

Andrew Saydjari

Assistant Professor

New Mexico State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Ben Burningham

University of Hertfordshire

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Earl Bellinger

Assistant Professor

Yale University

UNITED STATES
View details

Graham Edwards

Assistant Professor

Trinity University

UNITED STATES
View details

Andrew Casey

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details