Giovanni Maria Garbarino
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (14)
Background: Peptic ulcers result from imbalanced acid production, and in recent decades, proton pump inhibitors have proven effective in treating them. However, perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) continue to occur with a persistent high mortality rate when not managed properly. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach have been widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, concerning certain technical aspects of this method, such as the best gastrorrhaphy technique, the consensus remains elusive. Consequently, the choice tends to rely on individual surgical experiences. Our study aimed to compare interrupted stitches versus running barbed suture for laparoscopic PPU repair. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study utilizing propensity score matching analysis on patients who underwent laparoscopic PPU repair. Patients were categorised into two groups: Interrupted Stitches Suture (IStiS) and Knotless Suture (KnotS). We then compared the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients in both groups. Results: A total of 265 patients underwent laparoscopic PPU repair: 198 patients with interrupted stitches technique and 67 with barbed knotless suture. Following propensity score matching, each group (IStiS and KnotS) comprised 56 patients. The analysis revealed that operative time did not differ between groups: 87.9 ± 39.7 vs. 92.8 ± 42.6 min (p = 0.537). Postoperative morbidity (24.0% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.331) and Clavien–Dindo III (10.7% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.489) were more frequently observed in the KnotS group, without any significant difference. In contrast, we found a slightly higher mortality rate in the IStiS group (10.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.742). Concerning leaks, no differences emerged between groups (3.6% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.000). Conclusions: Laparoscopic PPU repair with knotless barbed sutures is a non-inferior alternative to interrupted stitches repair. Nevertheless, further research such as randomised trials, with a standardised treatment protocol according to ulcer size, are required to identify the best gastrorraphy technique.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Collaborators (14)
Paolo MERCANTINI
Sapienza University
Marco Ceresoli
-
bruno annibale
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
mattia falchetto osti
Full Professor
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia
Gianluca Costa
Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences
Mark van Berge Henegouwen
Professor of Upper GI Surgery
University of Amsterdam
Alessandro Coppola
Assistant Professor
Sapienza University of Rome
Raffaele Troiano
Sapienza University of Rome
Pietro Fransvea
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Damiano Caruso
-
Emanuela PILOZZI
Sapienza University of Rome
Cristina Bombardini
University of Ferrara
paolo pietro bianchi
Universita degli Studi di Milano Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute
Andrea Laghi
Sapienza University of Rome
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.