GS Magwood

Background Fragmented care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is known to correlate negatively with outcomes, but it is unclear which aspects of care fragmentation are relevant and potentially modifiable. Furthermore, there is little data on the relationship between travel distance and the benefits of integrated care models. Hypothesizing care coordination in the preoperative period may have a significant impact on surgical outcomes, we explored associations between integrated care, travel distance, and surgical outcomes. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing index abdominal surgery was done to compare the rate of surgical complications with and without long travel distance and nonintegrated preoperative care. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with complications. Results One hundred and fifty-seven patients were included. Complications were more common among patients with travel distance >75 miles (47.6% vs 27.4%, P = .012). Integrated preoperative care was not significant on bivariate (P = .381) or multivariable analysis but had a stronger association among patients with travel distance <75 miles (20.9% integrated vs 36.7%, P = .138). After adjustment, new ileostomy, open surgical approach, and distance >75 miles were independently associated with complications. Conclusions Patients with longer travel distances to the hospital were twice as likely to have a surgical complication after adjusting for other risk factors. Without significant accommodations for remote patients, potential benefits of an integrated model for IBD care may be limited to patients who live close to the medical center. Future efforts addressing continuity of care should consider tactics to mitigate the impact of travel distance on outcomes.

Introduction Fragmented care overwhelmingly affects populations with multimorbid chronic conditions, like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, strategies to mitigate care fragmentation typically focus on singular disease frameworks with insufficient evidence regarding approaches for individuals with two or more concurrent chronic conditions (multimorbidity). This review explores the literature to identify the (C)ontextual influences, underlying (M)echanisms, and associated (O)utcomes of fragmented care prevention in SLE and other multimorbid conditions. Methods A realist review was applied to systematically examine literature, including the search of >1300 published articles focused on SLE and multimorbidity, continuity of care, and approaches to mitigate fragmented care. The analysis was guided by care continuity elements and organized by fragmented care concepts explicated by the MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovations Care Coordination Model and further grouped for context–mechanism–outcome (CMO) configurations. Results Fourteen articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the sample to illustrate the relationship between C-M-O for approaches focused on fragmented care prevention. Favorable outcomes in mechanisms that produced positive responses to resources relevant to fragmented care prevention included 1) opportunities for exposure and negotiation within professional teams, 2) structured health education, role clarity, and access to adherence services for patients, and 3) awareness of workflow waste and use of clinical algorithms. Discussion Review findings suggest using a multidimensional approach to mitigate fragmented care in SLE and other multimorbid conditions. Multidimensional approaches should focus on shared decision-making, social support, social–cultural–economic factors, patient engagement, and technological infrastructure to support the complex care needs of the multimorbid patient.