Ines Neundorf

Cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been explored as versatile tools to transport various molecules into cells. The uptake mechanism of CPPs is still not clearly understood and most probably depends on several factors like the nature of the CPP itself, the attached cargo, the investigated cell system, and other experimental conditions, such as temperature and concentration. One of the first steps of internalization involves the interaction of CPPs with negatively charged molecules present at the outer layer of the cell membrane. Recently, thiol‐mediated uptake has been found to support the effective translocation of sulfhydryl‐bearing substances that would actually not be cell‐permeable. Within this work, we aimed to understand the relevance of thiol reactivity for the uptake mechanism of cysteine‐containing CPPs that we have developed previously in our group. Therefore, we compared the two peptides, sC18‐Cys and CaaX‐1, in their single reduced and dimeric disulfide versions. Cytotoxicity, intracellular accumulation, and impact on the internalization process of the disulfides were investigated in HeLa cells. Both disulfide CPPs demonstrated significantly stronger cytotoxic effects and membrane activity compared with their reduced counterparts. Notably, thiol‐mediated uptake could be excluded as a main driver for translocation, showing that peptides like CaaX‐1 are most likely taken up by other mechanisms.