Ingrid Poulsen
Research Interests
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (10)
Aim To assess the agreement between patients' self‐reported degree‐of‐worry (DOW) and nurses' evaluation of patients' DOW. Design An observational cohort study with patients and their primary nurses. Methods Between 22 February and 27 March 2021, data collection among patients and their nurses in an emergency department was carried out. Patients ≥18 years, cognitively intact and Danish or English speaking were eligible to participate. Nurses regardless of seniority and gender were eligible for participation. The single‐item degree‐of‐worry measure, ‘how worried are you about the condition you are here today on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimally worried and 10 is maximum worried’ as well as information on gender, age, co‐morbidity, triage level and medical reason for encounter was collected from patients. The corresponding nurses were asked; ‘how worried do you think your patient is about the condition he/she is there today on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimally worried and 10 is maximum worried?’ Nurses also supplied data on gender, age, seniority as a Registered Nurse and in the ED. Agreement between patients' self‐reported degree‐of‐worry and nurses' evaluation of patients' degree‐of‐worry was assessed with weighted Cohen's Kappa. Results A total of 194 patient–nurse pairs were included for analysis. The agreement between patients' DOW and nurses' evaluation of patients' DOW categorised as DOW low , DOW middle and DOW high was in total agreement in n = 85 pairs (43.8%) of the ratings, which corresponds to a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.19 (0.08–0.30; p < 0.001). Conclusion Nurses estimate of their patients' DOW was in very poor agreement. This indicates that nurses are not able to assess the patient's DOW to a satisfactory level. This result is troubling as it may have serious consequences for patient care as it indicates that the nurses do not know their patients' perspectives.
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Collaborators (10)
Helle Vendel Petersen
-
Nicolas Lejeune
University of Liege
Ann-Marie Morrissey
University of Limerick
kristian larsen
Københavns Universitet
Anette Lykke Hindhede
Københavns Universitet
Dorthe G. Bove
-
Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
Copenhagen University Hospital
Helene L. Soberg
Professor
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Annette Kjaersgaard
Aarhus University
Pia Soe Jensen
Associate professor (20%) section for nursing
Roskilde University
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.