Jennifer Gruenhagen

Background: The literature comparing bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) with socket prosthesis (SP) consistently reports improvement in physical health and quality of life using primarily patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Objective: To determine the differences in mobility and balance using performance-based outcome measures and PROMs in people with transfemoral amputations (TFAs) fitted with BAP vs. SP. Study design: Causal comparative. Methods: Two groups of people with TFAs were recruited: one using a BAP (N = 11; mean age ± standard deviation, 44 ± 14.9 years; mean residual limb length as a percentage of the intact femur, 68% ± 15.9) and another group using a SP (N = 11; mean age ± standard deviation, 49.6 ± 16.0 years; mean residual limb length as a percentage of the intact femur, 81% ± 13.9), and completed the 10-meter walk test, component timed-up-and-go, Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility™ 12-item, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the BAP and SP groups in temporal spatial gait parameters and prosthetic mobility as measured by the 10-meter walk test and component timed-up-and-go, yet large effect sizes were found for several variables. In addition, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility™ scores were not statistically different between the BAP and SP groups, yet a large effect sizes were found for both variables. Conclusions: This study found that people with TFA who use a BAP can demonstrate similar temporal spatial gait parameters and prosthetic mobility, as well as self-perceived balance confidence and prosthetic mobility as SP users. Therefore, suggesting that the osseointegration reconstruction surgical procedure provides an alternative option for a specific population with TFA who cannot wear nor have limitations with a SP. Future research with a larger sample and other performance-based outcome measures and PROMs of prosthetic mobility and balance would further determine the differences between the prosthetic options.

Background: Although there have been a number of studies exploring the impact and efficacy of transfemoral prosthetic components such as knee and foot mechanisms, the empirical evidence surrounding transfemoral prosthetic interface considerations is limited. This constitutes a substantial void for practicing clinicians seeking to apply best practices for patients who use transfemoral prostheses. Recent years have seen increased production and availability of clinical practice guidelines germane to prosthetic rehabilitation. In those areas where empirical evidence is lacking, consensus clinical opinions may constitute the highest level of evidence. Objective: A consensus exercise was performed to generate clinical practice recommendations in the areas of transfemoral interface considerations including socket variations and critical design features, suspension and interface considerations, alignment, heat retention and dermatologic considerations, female considerations, surgical considerations, and both regulatory and ethical considerations related to osseointegration. Methods: This began with the generation of postulate items through systematic and narrative literature reviews. A Delphi consensus exercise was performed among clinical experts in government hospital and private clinical practice settings, culminating in a series of clinical practice recommendations associated with the prosthesis–limb interface for individuals with transfemoral amputation. Results: The completed recommendations include guidance statements relative to socket variations and critical design features, female considerations, suspension and interface considerations, surgical variations and prescription considerations, rehabilitation team considerations and both regulatory and ethical considerations related to osseointegration. Conclusions: The Delphi process facilitated the development of practice guidelines for transfemoral prosthetic interface considerations based on aggregated subject matter expertise.