Jessica E Goetz
Has grant
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Recent Grants
Grant: Close
The Utility of Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction in Syndesmotic Injuries
Open Date: 2019-06-01
Close Date: 2020-05-31
Grant: Close
The Utility of Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction in Syndesmotic Injuries
Open Date: 2019-06-01
Close Date: 2020-05-31
Grant: Close
Joint contact stress as a tool for clinical decision making in PAO
Open Date: 2017-07-01
Close Date: 2021-06-30
Grant: Close
Joint contact stress as a tool for clinical decision making in PAO
Open Date: 2017-07-01
Close Date: 2021-06-30
Grant: Close
Translating Metabolic Responses to Mechanical Insult into Early Interventions to Prevent PTOA
Open Date: 2016-10-01
Close Date: 2017-09-01
Articles (18)
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Background and objectives: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and “physiologic” loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD. Methods: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations—physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations—physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses. Results: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher ( R 2 = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower ( R 2 = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001). Conclusions: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD.
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Collaborators (7)
Joshua Holt
Assistant Professor
University of Iowa Healthcare
Mitchell C. Coleman
-
John E. Femino
Clinical Professor
The University of Iowa University College
Benjamin Miller
Iowa State University
Don Anderson
Professor, Richard and Jan Johnston Chair in Orthopedic Biomechanics
Iowa State University
James Martin
Assistant Professor
Iowa State University
J Lawrence Marsh
Professor
University of Iowa Healthcare
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.