Jessica E Goetz

Has grant

The University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

The Utility of Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction in Syndesmotic Injuries

Open Date: 2019-06-01

Close Date: 2020-05-31

Grant: Close

The Utility of Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction in Syndesmotic Injuries

Open Date: 2019-06-01

Close Date: 2020-05-31

Grant: Close

Joint contact stress as a tool for clinical decision making in PAO

Open Date: 2017-07-01

Close Date: 2021-06-30

Grant: Close

Joint contact stress as a tool for clinical decision making in PAO

Open Date: 2017-07-01

Close Date: 2021-06-30

Grant: Close

Translating Metabolic Responses to Mechanical Insult into Early Interventions to Prevent PTOA

Open Date: 2016-10-01

Close Date: 2017-09-01

Articles (18)

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Background and objectives: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and “physiologic” loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD. Methods: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations—physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations—physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses. Results: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher ( R 2 = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower ( R 2 = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001). Conclusions: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD.

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Collaborators (7)

Joshua Holt

Assistant Professor

University of Iowa Healthcare

UNITED STATES
View details

Mitchell C. Coleman

-

UNITED STATES
View details

John E. Femino

Clinical Professor

The University of Iowa University College

UNITED STATES
View details

Benjamin Miller

Iowa State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Don Anderson

Professor, Richard and Jan Johnston Chair in Orthopedic Biomechanics

Iowa State University

UNITED STATES
View details

James Martin

Assistant Professor

Iowa State University

UNITED STATES
View details

J Lawrence Marsh

Professor

University of Iowa Healthcare

UNITED STATES
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.