Joanne Protheroe
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Articles (13)
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Background Health literacy is the ability to find information, understand information, know how to act on information and know which services to use. Having higher levels of health literacy may help patients to look after minor problems themselves (self-care). It may also help to reduce patients’ perceived need for contacting health services for minor health problems, to reduce the perceived urgency of problems or to improve patients’ ability to identify and choose from the range of available services. Interventions to improve health literacy for minor health problems have been evaluated, but their effectiveness at reducing use of primary care and emergency services has not been synthesised. Objectives The key objectives were as follows: (1) to construct a typology of interventions that aim to reduce primary or emergency care use, (2) to synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of different types of health literacy interventions and (3) to consider how stakeholders in the UK could operationalise the evidence. Interventions The interventions being reviewed were initiatives that help members of the population to self-care or make decisions about whether or not and where to seek health care for minor health problems. Design This study was a systematic review with stakeholder involvement. Data sources and review methods A meeting was held with 14 stakeholders (including patients, carers and the public) to guide the systematic review. This was followed by a multicomponent review of quantitative and qualitative research. Database literature searches were undertaken in Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library (via Wiley Interscience), EMBASE (via OVID), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via EBSCO), PsycINFO (via OVID), Web of Science and Sociological Abstracts. The search was limited to English-language publications from 1990–2020. To assess study quality, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for randomised controlled trials and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for non-randomised studies. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. The review was followed by a meeting with 16 stakeholders to interpret the results. Results A total of 67 articles (64 studies) were included: 37 from the USA, 16 from the UK, 12 from the rest of Europe and two from the rest of the world. There were seven intervention types: navigation tools directing people to the range of services available ( n = 7); written education about managing minor health problems in booklet or website format ( n = 17); person-delivered education ( n = 5); written education with person-delivered education ( n = 17); multicomponent of written education, person-delivered education and mass media campaign ( n = 5); self-triage ( n = 9); and other ( n = 7). Our team assessed the readability and user-friendliness of interventions, and found that these varied widely. When assessed, most studies measuring satisfaction with the intervention, enablement and perceived changes to behaviour showed pos
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (9)
Nathan Davies
University College London
Alexis Foster
University of Sheffield
Adrian Chudyk
Clinical Lecturer in General Practice
Keele University
Laurna Bullock
Keele University
Megan Armstrong
University College London
Holly Saron
Edge Hill University
Hollie Birkinshaw
University of Southampton
Mark Clowes
University of Sheffield
Fay Manning
Lecturer (Education and Research)
University of Exeter
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.