Launch week offerEnds in00h00m00s

Julie L. Daniels

Has grant

Professor

University of North Carolina
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

NC Childcare Academy

Open Date: 2025-10-01

Close Date: 2026-06-01

Grant: Close

NC Childcare Health and Safety Resources Center

Open Date: 2025-07-01

Close Date: 2026-06-01

Grant: Close

Promoting Healthy and Safe Environments for Young Children (Health and Safety Bulletins)

Open Date: 2025-07-01

Close Date: 2026-06-01

Grant: Close

Promoting Healthy and Safe Environments for Young Children (Health & Safety Bulletins)

Open Date: 2024-07-01

Close Date: 2025-06-01

Grant: Open

Early Life Determinants of Child Health: A New Denver-Based Cohort

Open Date: 2023-09-01

Close Date: 2030-05-31

Articles (8)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Background Current knowledge about parental reasons for allowing child participation in research comes mainly from clinical trials. Fewer data exist on parents’ motivations to enrol children in observational studies. Objectives Describe reasons parents of preschoolers gave for participating in the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a US multi‐site study of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental delays or disorders (DD), and explore reasons given by child diagnostic and behavioural characteristics at enrolment. Methods We included families of children, age 2–5 years, participating in SEED ( n = 5696) during 2007–2016. We assigned children to groups based on characteristics at enrolment: previously diagnosed ASD; suspected ASD; non‐ASD DD; and population controls (POP). During a study interview, we asked parents their reasons for participating. Two coders independently coded responses and resolved discrepancies via consensus. We fit binary mixed‐effects models to evaluate associations of each reason with group and demographics, using POP as reference. Results Participants gave 1–5 reasons for participation (mean = 1.7, SD = 0.7). Altruism (48.3%), ASD research interest (47.4%) and perceived personal benefit (26.9%) were most common. Two novel reasons were knowing someone outside the household with the study conditions (peripheral relationship; 14.1%) and desire to contribute to a specified result (1.4%). Odds of reporting interest in ASD research were higher among diagnosed ASD participants (odds ratio [OR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49–3.35). Perceived personal benefit had higher odds among diagnosed (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.61–2.29) or suspected ASD (OR 3.67, 95% CI 2.99–4.50) and non‐ASD DD (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.50–2.16) participants. Peripheral relationship with ASD/DD had lower odds among all case groups. Conclusions We identified meaningful differences between groups in parent‐reported reasons for participation. Differences demonstrate an opportunity for future studies to tailor recruitment materials and increase the perceived benefit for specific prospective participants.

Year:

2022

Collaborators (5)

Christine Ladd-Acosta

Associate Professor

Johns Hopkins University

UNITED STATES
View details

Kristina Hightshoe

Senior Research Scientist

Colorado School of Public Health

UNITED STATES
View details

Sunni L Mumford

University of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES
View details

Eric Moody

Asst Prof

University of Wyoming

UNITED STATES
View details

Daniel Westreich

Professor

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

UNITED STATES
View details