Juliusz Huber

The clinical neurophysiological tests allow us to determine the type, extent, and nature of brachial plexus damage. They are crucial in decision making regarding surgical procedures or conservative treatment. This report aimed to present an algorithm for rehabilitation procedures in patients with brachial plexus injury of various origins based on the results of neurophysiology findings for the selection of procedures supporting the process of nerve and muscle regeneration. The research group consisted of patients whose medical documentation was analysed concerning the reason, level, and localization of damage to the brachial plexus structures, surgical and or rehabilitative treatment, as well as the MRI results. Among the group of fourteen patients, the clinical studies showed the greatest incidence of brachial plexus injuries of the mixed (both pre- and postganglionic), all trunks, and cervical root injuries, respectively. Results of the motor evoked potentials (MEP) and electroneurography (ENG) recordings induced at levels of spinal roots and Erb’s point showed a decrease of more than 40% in amplitudes on the symptomatic side in comparison to the asymptomatic side. This diffeence was recorded for the axillary and radial innervation and the C5, C6, and C7 root domains, ranging from 57% to 66%; the lowest decrease was recorded following electrical stimulation at Erb’s point for the ulnar nerve (34%). The latency prolongation on the symptomatic side in CMAP and MEP tests ranged from 0.2 to 1.7 ms, with the most following magnetic stimulation of the C5 cervical root for the axillary innervation. Most of the results indicated the axonotmesis and neuropraxia type of injury in motor fibers (40%) confirmed by EMG results. The sensory conduction studies (SNCS) in distal nerve branches did not confirm the severe advancement of the brachial plexus injury (63%). The proposed algorithm of the physiotherapeutic procedures should be mainly targeted for recovery of motor dysfunction as the consequence of brachial plexus injury. Rehabilitation should incorporate the treatment supporting nerve regeneration, muscle strengthening, and maintaining functional ranges of motion of the injured extremities. The rehabilitation treatment for patients with brachial plexus injuries is an individualised process, and the selection of procedures and the effectiveness of the treatment undertaken should be confronted with results of neurophysiological tests verifying the motor neural transmission from the level of the cervical motor centre to the effector, peripheral nerve function, and muscle’s motor unit activity.

Introduction: A practical solution to the incidental unreliability of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) may be the simultaneous neurophysiological recording and control of the surgical field through a camera (the concept of “Real-time” IONM). During “Real-time” IONM, the surgeon is immediately warned about the possibility of damage to the neural structures during, but not after, standard idiopathic scoliosis (IS) corrective surgery procedures (the concept of “Surgeon–neurophysiologist” interactive, verbal IONM). This study aimed to compare the advantages, utilities, reliabilities, and time consumption of the two IONM scenarios. Methods: Studies were performed in two similar groups of patients undergoing surgery primarily due to Lenke 2 idiopathic scoliosis (N = 120), when both IONM approaches were applied. Neurophysiological evaluations of the spinal transmission were performed pre- (T0), intra- (before (T1) and after (T2) surgery), and postoperatively (T3), as well as once in healthy volunteers (control, N = 60). Non-invasive and innovative recordings of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally from the peroneal (PER) nerve and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle were performed with surface electrodes as a result of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electrical stimulation (TES) at T0–T3. Results: In both groups, the MEP amplitudes and latencies recorded from the PER nerve were approximately 67% lower and 3.1 ms shorter than those recorded from the TA muscle. The MEP recording parameters differed similarly at T0–T3 compared to the control group. In all patients, the MEP parameters induced by TMS (T0) and TES (T1) did not differ. The MEP amplitude parameters recorded from the TA and PER at T1 and T2 indicated a bilateral improvement in the neural spinal conduction due to the surgical intervention. The TMS-induced MEP amplitude at T3 further increased bilaterally. In both IONM groups, an average 51.8 BIS level of anesthesia did not affect the variability in the MEP amplitude, especially in the PER recordings when the applied TES strength was 98.2 mA. The number of fluctuations in the MEP parameters was closely related to the number of warnings from the neurophysiologist during the transpedicular screw implantation, corrective rod implantation, and distraction, derotation, and compression procedures, and it was higher in the “Surgeon–neurophysiologist” IONM group. The average duration of surgery was shorter by approximately one hour in the “Real-time” IONM group. The number of two-way communications between the surgeon and the neurophysiologist and vice versa in the “Real-time” IONM group decreased by approximately half. Conclusions: This study proves the superiority of using “Real-time” IONM over the standard “Surgeon–neurophysiologist” IONM procedure in increasing the safety and non-invasiveness, shortening the time, and lowering the costs of the surgical treatment of IS patients. The modifications of the MEP nerve-conduction-recording technology with surface electrodes from nerves enable precise and reliable information on the pediatric patient’s neurological condition at every stage of the applied surgical procedures, even under conditions of slight fluctuations in anesthesia.