Karen Dunn Lopez

Objectives Electronic health records (EHRs) user interfaces (UI) designed for data entry can potentially impact the quality of patient information captured in the EHRs. This review identified and synthesized the literature evidence about the relationship of UI features in EHRs on data quality (DQ). Materials and methods We performed an integrative review of research studies by conducting a structured search in 5 databases completed on October 10, 2022. We applied Whittemore & Knafl’s methodology to identify literature, extract, and synthesize information, iteratively. We adapted Kmet et al appraisal tool for the quality assessment of the evidence. The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020203998). Results Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. The relationship between 1 or more UI features and 1 or more DQ indicators was examined. UI features were classified into 4 categories: 3 types of data capture aids, and other methods of DQ assessment at the UI. The Weiskopf et al measures were used to assess DQ: completeness (n = 10), correctness (n = 10), and currency (n = 3). UI features such as mandatory fields, templates, and contextual autocomplete improved completeness or correctness or both. Measures of currency were scarce. Discussion The paucity of studies on UI features and DQ underscored the limited knowledge in this important area. The UI features examined had both positive and negative effects on DQ. Standardization of data entry and further development of automated algorithmic aids, including adaptive UIs, have great promise for improving DQ. Further research is essential to ensure data captured in our electronic systems are high quality and valid for use in clinical decision-making and other secondary analyses.

Objective To honor the legacy of nursing informatics pioneer and visionary, Dr. Virginia Saba, the Friends of the National Library of Medicine convened a group of international experts to reflect on Dr. Saba’s contributions to nursing standardized nursing terminologies. Process Experts led a day-and-a-half virtual update on nursing’s sustained and rigorous efforts to develop and use valid, reliable, and computable standardized nursing terminologies over the past 5 decades. Over the course of the workshop, policymakers, industry leaders, and scholars discussed the successful use of standardized nursing terminologies, the potential for expanded use of these vetted tools to advance healthcare, and future needs and opportunities. In this article, we elaborate on this vision and key recommendations for continued and expanded adoption and use of standardized nursing terminologies across settings and systems with the goal of generating new knowledge that improves health. Conclusion Much of the promise that the original creators of standardized nursing terminologies envisioned has been achieved. Secondary analysis of clinical data using these terminologies has repeatedly demonstrated the value of nursing and nursing’s data. With increased and widespread adoption, these achievements can be replicated across settings and systems.