Launch week offerEnds in00h00m00s

Kazuya Nakayachi

Has grant

Professor

Doshisha University
Country flagJapan

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Combined effect of statistical and case-based victim information: Toward a framework for providing risk information

Open Date: 2020-04-01

Close Date: 2024-04-01

Grant: Close

Psychological approach to improving the effectiveness of Earthquake Early Warnings

Open Date: 2020-04-01

Close Date: 2021-03-01

Grant: Close

Spreading effects of providing measures for disaster risk

Open Date: 2016-04-01

Close Date: 2020-03-01

Grant: Close

Analyses of risk perception paradox and its applicatin to promote prepatation for disasters

Open Date: 2015-04-01

Close Date: 2017-03-01

Grant: Close

Vulnerability in evacuation scripts, the promotion of disaster preparedness, and their ripple effects on risk perception

Open Date: 2012-04-01

Close Date: 2016-03-01

Articles (5)

Year:

2025

A team of social scientists from the United States and Japan has conducted a study exploring the extent to which municipal governments in Japan have developed plans for response to an operational earthquake forecast from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), indicating that seismic activity in the Nankai trough region has elevated the short-term probability that a major earthquake may occur. Employing both survey research and in-depth interviews, the team explored various aspects of the history and science behind the alerting system, guidance from the national government of Japan, and planning by local jurisdictions for a possible future Nankai trough major earthquake. The survey included questions regarding planning actions included in response plans for receipt of “special earthquake warning information” as well as questions regarding challenges in the planning process, expectations that an earthquake would follow the issuance of an alert, and whether planning would reduce the number of fatalities and injuries. We also conducted in-depth interviews that explored the scientific basis for the alerting system and asked working disaster managers in the Nankai region what they had done to plan and the reasons for not planning if plans had not been developed. We received 469 responses from a total of 736 jurisdictions that comprise the Nankai region—a response rate of 63.7%. We conducted a total of 17 in-depth interviews. In general, we found that a majority of jurisdictions have response plans for receipt of an alert from the JMA; however, the plans lacked a number of planning elements considered important from a disaster management perspective. In addition, many smaller jurisdictions lacked the staffing, resources, and guidance to form comprehensive response plans. Our report identifies both the strengths and weaknesses of existing plans, and outlines a program for improving planning in the region.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Collaborators (4)

Takashi Sugiyama

Associate Professor

Kyushu University

JAPAN
View details

Yu Matsubara

Shiga University

JAPAN
View details

Julia Becker

Associate Professor

Massey University - Manawatu Campus

NEW ZEALAND
View details

Ryosuke YOKOI

Senior Lecturer

Chukyo University

JAPAN
View details