Kosuke Niitsu

Aim Higher levels of perceived control are important to maintain health. The difference in factors related to perceived control and preventive behaviors during the COVID‐19 pandemic between Japanese and American nursing students remains unknown. This study aimed to compare factors related to perceived control and infection preventive behaviors between the two countries. Methods This cross‐sectional study included nursing students attending four universities in Japan and one in the United States. Using Google Forms, the participants answered a survey comprising sociodemographic data, the Perceived Control and Self‐Efficacy Scale, the Perceived Health Competence Scale, and a preventive behavior questionnaire. The data were collected from November 2020 to May 2021. Linear and logistic regressions were used to analyze the factors related to perceived control and preventive behaviors, respectively. Results Data from 878 students were analyzed. University/campus emerged as a strong predictor for perceived control and preventive behaviors in both countries, with a positive correlation between perceived control and preventive behaviors. Older age, less frequent alcohol consumption, higher perceived health competence, less frequent work in Japan; and chronic conditions in the United States were associated with frequent preventive behaviors. Younger age was correlated with higher perceived control in Japan, while religion and increased workload were potential factors for American students. Conclusion Individual factors were pivotal in Japan, whereas interpersonal factors were more likely related to perceived control in the United States. Additionally, in both countries, policy or organizational factors significantly influenced students' preventive behaviors.

Background: Individuals with food addiction (FA) compose a distinct subset of people with obesity who are less responsive to weight loss interventions. An emerging field of study explores the role of telomere length in disease processes. Some evidence suggests that obesity is associated with telomere shortening; however, we are not aware of studies examining telomere length in obesity subtypes. Therefore, we explored whether FA and levels of obesity were associated with telomere shortening. Methods: We enrolled 120 adults (aged 19–70) with overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25); half were positive for severe food addiction (FA+), and half were negative for food addiction (FA−) (Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0). Participants completed a demographic form and provided a saliva sample (Oragene saliva DNA collection kit). Telomere length was analyzed using the monoplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and ANOVAs (α = 0.05). Results: Participants with overweight (mean = 1.40 t/s, SD = 0.40) had longer telomeres (p = 0.013) than those with morbid obesity (mean = 1.15 t/s, SD = 1.29). Telomere length did not differ (p = 0.306) between persons who were FA− (mean = 1.26 t/s, SD = 0.26) and those who were FA+ (mean = 1.32 t/s, SD = 0.34). The youngest participants (mean = 1.39 t/s, SD = 0.33) had longer telomeres (p = 0.006) than the oldest participants (mean = 1.18 t/s, SD = 0.19). Conclusion: Those who were morbidly obese had the shortest telomere lengths. Interestingly, however, there were not significant telomere length differences in the food addicted vs. nonfood-addicted subtypes.