Kristi R. G. Hendrickson

Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (6)

Year:

2025

Purpose The purpose of this survey study is to compare the experiences of programs and applicants in the MedPhys Match (MPM) in the 2020–21 match cycle with experiences reported from previous match cycles. The 2020–21 match cycle was unique in that recruitment and interviewing were almost exclusively virtual during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods A survey was sent to all applicants and programs registered for the 2020–21 MPM. Survey questions asked about the pre‐interview screening, interview, ranking, and post‐match stages of the residency match process. Survey data were analyzed using graphical methods and spreadsheet tools. Results Advantages and disadvantages to the virtual interviewing experience were reported by applicants and program directors (PDs). The advantages included reduced cost and greater scheduling flexibility with fewer scheduling conflicts, allowing applicants to consider more programs. These advantages greatly outweighed the disadvantages such as the inability to meet faculty/staff and current residents in person and gauge the feel of the program. PDs recognized the advantages of minimal costs and time savings for applicants. Programs reported it was difficult to convey workplace culture and the physical environment and to gauge personality and interpersonal skills of the applicants. Conclusion The virtual interviewing environment for residency recruitment in medical physics is strongly preferred by applicants over required in‐person interviews. The advantages identified by applicants outweigh the disadvantages, allowing applicants to feel confident in their ranking decisions and overall satisfied with their match results. PDs acknowledge the greater equity of access to interviews for applicants in the virtual environment, however, they are overall less satisfied with their ability to showcase their program's strengths and to assess the personality of applicants. Caution is urged when considering a hybrid interview model to ensure fair assessments that do not depend on whether an applicant chooses to accept an optional in‐person interview or site visit.

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Collaborators (6)

Minsun Kim

-

UNITED STATES
View details

Titania Juang

Assistant Professor

University of California, San Diego

UNITED STATES
View details

Cassandra Stambaugh

-

UNITED STATES
View details

Anna Rodrigues

Duke University

UNITED STATES
View details

Kelly Paradis

University of Michigan

UNITED STATES
View details

Juergen Meyer

Professor

University of Washington Medical Center

UNITED STATES
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.