Your Twin learns with you

30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro

Ends in00h00m00s

Lane Frasier

Has grant

Assistant Professor

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

About

Lane Frasier is an Assistant Professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine in the United States. His research interests primarily focus on medical simulation and intraoperative communication. Recent publications include studies on bleeding control simulation in medical student orientation and analyses of intraoperative hand-off processes. Dr. Frasier is dedicated to improving medical education and patient safety through innovative teaching methods.

Recent Grants

Grant: Open

Building High Volume En Route Care Simulations to Analyze and Optimize Patient Transports for Great Power Competition: New Simulation Center Infrastructure

Open Date: 2026-02-01

Close Date: 2027-02-01

Grant: Open

En Route Medical Monitoring and Air-to-ground Triage

Open Date: 2025-07-01

Close Date: 2027-04-01

Grant: Close

Contingent Leadership within the Ground Surgical Team (GST) Context

Open Date: 2024-12-01

Close Date: 2026-06-01

Grant: Open

Dynamic and Realistic Research with Immersive Operations: Research Developmental Test and Evaluation for Multi-Casualty Care Incidents (DARRIO)

Open Date: 2024-09-01

Close Date: 2028-09-01

Grant: Close

Efficacy of High-Fidelity Simulation for High Volume En Route Care Mission Readiness

Open Date: 2024-05-01

Close Date: 2026-05-01

Articles (9)

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Background The Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) Advanced Course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to assess personnel readiness for deployment. This study aims to determine whether simple well-defined demographic identifiers can be used to predict CCAT students’ performance at CCAT Advanced. Materials and Methods CCAT Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/fail) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students’ Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), military status (active duty and reserve/guard), CCAT deployment experience (yes/no), prior CCAT Advanced training (yes/no), medical specialty, rank, and unit sustainment training frequency (never, frequency less often than monthly, and frequency at least monthly). Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCAT Advanced course for each provider type. Results A total of 2,576 student surveys were analyzed: 694 (27%) physicians (MDs), 1,051 (40%) registered nurses (RNs), and 842 (33%) respiratory therapists (RTs). The overall passing rates were 92.2%, 90.3%, and 85.4% for the MDs, RNs, and RTs, respectively. The students were composed of 579 (22.5%) reserve/guard personnel, 636 (24.7%) with CCAT deployment experience, and 616 (23.9%) with prior CCAT Advanced training. Regression analysis identified groups with lower odds of passing; these included (1) RNs who promoted from Captain to Major (post-hoc analysis, P = .03), (2) RTs with rank Senior Airman, as compared to Master Sergeants (post-hoc analysis, P = .04), and (3) MDs with a nontraditional AFSC (P = .0004). Predictors of passing included MDs and RNs with CCAT deployment experience, odds ratio 2.97 (P = .02) and 2.65 (P = .002), respectively; and RTs who engaged in unit CCAT sustainment at least monthly (P = .02). The identifiers prior CCAT Advanced training or reserve/guard military status did not confer a passing advantage. Conclusion Our main result is that simple readily available metrics available to unit commanders can identify those members at risk for poor performance at CCAT Advanced readiness training; these include RNs with rank Major or above, RTs with rank Senior Airman, and RTs who engage in unit sustainment training less often than monthly. Finally, MD specialties which are nontraditional for CCAT have significantly lower CCAT Advanced passing rates, reserve/guard students did not outperform active duty students, there was no difference in the performance between different RN specialties, and for MD and RN students’ previous deployment experience was a strong predictor of passing.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2020

Collaborators (4)

Suzanne Rose

Senior Vice Dean for Medical Education

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

UNITED STATES
View details

Tandis Soltani

University of Michigan

UNITED STATES
View details

Daniel Holena

Associate Professor

Medical University of South Carolina

UNITED STATES
View details

Richard J Strilka

-

UNITED STATES
View details