Meet ApplyKite Twin, the application assistant that learns with you
Meet your Twin, it learns with you
Your Twin learns with you
Launch week codes:30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro
Ends in00h00m00s
Ends in00h00m00s
Lane Frasier
Has grant
Assistant Professor
Research Interests
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.
Explore related searches
About
Lane Frasier is an Assistant Professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine in the United States. His research interests primarily focus on medical simulation and intraoperative communication. Recent publications include studies on bleeding control simulation in medical student orientation and analyses of intraoperative hand-off processes. Dr. Frasier is dedicated to improving medical education and patient safety through innovative teaching methods.
Recent Grants
Grant: Open
Building High Volume En Route Care Simulations to Analyze and Optimize Patient Transports for Great Power Competition: New Simulation Center Infrastructure
Open Date: 2026-02-01
Close Date: 2027-02-01
Grant: Open
En Route Medical Monitoring and Air-to-ground Triage
Open Date: 2025-07-01
Close Date: 2027-04-01
Grant: Close
Contingent Leadership within the Ground Surgical Team (GST) Context
Open Date: 2024-12-01
Close Date: 2026-06-01
Grant: Open
Dynamic and Realistic Research with Immersive Operations: Research Developmental Test and Evaluation for Multi-Casualty Care Incidents (DARRIO)
Open Date: 2024-09-01
Close Date: 2028-09-01
Grant: Close
Efficacy of High-Fidelity Simulation for High Volume En Route Care Mission Readiness
Open Date: 2024-05-01
Close Date: 2026-05-01
Articles (9)
Year:
2026
Year:
2026
Year:
2026
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Background The Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) Advanced Course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to assess personnel readiness for deployment. This study aims to determine whether simple well-defined demographic identifiers can be used to predict CCAT students’ performance at CCAT Advanced. Materials and Methods CCAT Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/fail) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students’ Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), military status (active duty and reserve/guard), CCAT deployment experience (yes/no), prior CCAT Advanced training (yes/no), medical specialty, rank, and unit sustainment training frequency (never, frequency less often than monthly, and frequency at least monthly). Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCAT Advanced course for each provider type. Results A total of 2,576 student surveys were analyzed: 694 (27%) physicians (MDs), 1,051 (40%) registered nurses (RNs), and 842 (33%) respiratory therapists (RTs). The overall passing rates were 92.2%, 90.3%, and 85.4% for the MDs, RNs, and RTs, respectively. The students were composed of 579 (22.5%) reserve/guard personnel, 636 (24.7%) with CCAT deployment experience, and 616 (23.9%) with prior CCAT Advanced training. Regression analysis identified groups with lower odds of passing; these included (1) RNs who promoted from Captain to Major (post-hoc analysis, P = .03), (2) RTs with rank Senior Airman, as compared to Master Sergeants (post-hoc analysis, P = .04), and (3) MDs with a nontraditional AFSC (P = .0004). Predictors of passing included MDs and RNs with CCAT deployment experience, odds ratio 2.97 (P = .02) and 2.65 (P = .002), respectively; and RTs who engaged in unit CCAT sustainment at least monthly (P = .02). The identifiers prior CCAT Advanced training or reserve/guard military status did not confer a passing advantage. Conclusion Our main result is that simple readily available metrics available to unit commanders can identify those members at risk for poor performance at CCAT Advanced readiness training; these include RNs with rank Major or above, RTs with rank Senior Airman, and RTs who engage in unit sustainment training less often than monthly. Finally, MD specialties which are nontraditional for CCAT have significantly lower CCAT Advanced passing rates, reserve/guard students did not outperform active duty students, there was no difference in the performance between different RN specialties, and for MD and RN students’ previous deployment experience was a strong predictor of passing.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2020
Collaborators (4)
Suzanne Rose
Senior Vice Dean for Medical Education
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
Tandis Soltani
University of Michigan
Daniel Holena
Associate Professor
Medical University of South Carolina
Richard J Strilka
-
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.