Lauren McDaniel

Background Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP–SMX) is active against most Staphylococcus aureus isolates but is not widely used for the treatment of pediatric osteoarticular infections. Methods This was a comparative effectiveness study of hospitalized patients ≤18 years treated with TMP–SMX vs. other antibiotic regimens for acute osteoarticular infections between 2016 and 2021 at 3 hospitals using inverse probability of treatment weighted propensity score analysis. The primary outcome was treatment failure, a composite of unanticipated emergency department (ED) or outpatient visits, hospital readmissions, extension, or change of antibiotic therapy due to inadequate clinical response, or death, all within 6 months after completing antibiotics. The secondary outcome was antibiotic-associated adverse events (AEs) within 6 months. The exposed group for the treatment failure analysis included children who received ≥7 days of TMP–SMX and did not experience treatment failure while on another antibiotic. Children receiving at least 1 dose of TMP–SMX were the exposed group for the AE analysis. Results One-hundred and sixteen patients met eligibility criteria; 26 (22.4%) patients were classified into the TMP–SMX cohort and 90 (77.6%) into the other antibiotics cohort (most commonly clindamycin, vancomycin, and cefazolin). There was no significant difference in treatment failure between TMP–SMX and other antibiotics (43% vs. 19%; 95% CI .9–10.4). More patients in the TMP–SMX cohort experienced an unplanned ED or outpatient visit (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3–17.8). There was no difference in hospital readmission, antibiotic change, or duration extension. Exposure to TMP–SMX was associated with more AEs (41% vs. 19%, P = .012). Conclusions Treatment with TMP–SMX was not associated with greater clinical failure but was associated with more AEs compared to alternative agents for the treatment of pediatric acute osteoarticular infections.

The objective of this study was to understand the existing practices and attitudes regarding inpatient sleep at the 2020 US News and World Report (USNWR) Honor Roll pediatric ( n = 10) and adult ( n = 20) hospitals. Section chiefs of Hospital Medicine from these institutions were surveyed and interviewed between June and August 2021. Among 23 of 30 surveyed physician leaders (response rate = 77%), 96% ( n = 22) rated patient sleep as important, but only 43% ( n = 10) were satisfied with their institutions' efforts. A total of 96% ( n = 22) of institutions lack sleep equity practices. Fewer than half (48%) of top hospitals have sleep‐friendly practices, with the most common practices including reducing overnight vital sign monitoring (43%), decreasing ambient light in the wards (43%), adjusting lab and medication schedules (35%), and implementing quiet hours (30%). Major themes from qualitative interviews included: importance of universal sleep‐friendly cultures, environmental changes, and external incentives to improve patient sleep.