Launch week offerEnds in00h00m00s

Lemaitre Frederic

Faculty member / Enseignant-chercheur / Enseignante-chercheuse

Université de Lorraine
Country flagFrance

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

Articles (13)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

This single-blind, crossover study aimed to measure and evaluate the short-term metabolic responses to continuous and intermittent hypoxic patterns in individuals with obesity. Indirect calorimetry was used to quantify changes in resting metabolic rate (RMR), carbohydrate (CHO ox , %CHO), and fat oxidation (FAT ox , %FAT) in nine individuals with obesity pre and post: 1) breathing normoxic air [normoxic sham control (NS-control)], 2) breathing continuous hypoxia (CH), or 3) breathing intermittent hypoxia (IH). A mean peripheral oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]) of 80–85% was achieved over a total of 45 min of hypoxia. Throughout each intervention, pulmonary gas exchanges, oxygen consumption (V̇o 2 ) carbon dioxide production (V̇co 2 ), and deoxyhemoglobin concentration (Δ[HHb]) in the vastus lateralis were measured. Both RMR and CHO ox measured pre- and postinterventions were unchanged following each treatment: NS-control, CH, or IH (all P > 0.05). Conversely, a significant increase in FAT ox was evident between pre- and post-IH (+44%, P = 0.048). Although the mean Δ[HHb] values significantly increased during both IH and CH ( P < 0.05), the greatest zenith of Δ[HHb] was achieved in IH compared with CH ( P = 0.002). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between Δ[HHb] and the shift in FAT ox measured pre- and postintervention. It is suggested that during IH, the increased bouts of muscle hypoxia, revealed by elevated Δ[HHb], coupled with cyclic periods of excess posthypoxia oxygen consumption (EPHOC, inherent to the intermittent pattern) played a significant role in driving the increase in FAT ox post-IH.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Purpose Hot water immersion (HWI) has gained popularity to promote muscle recovery, despite limited data on the optimal heat dose. The purpose of this study was to compare the responses of two exogenous heat strains on core body temperature, hemodynamic adjustments, and key functional markers of muscle recovery following exercise‐induced muscle damage (EIMD). Methods Twenty‐eight physically active males completed an individually tailored EIMD protocol immediately followed by one of the following recovery interventions: HWI (40°C, HWI 40 ), HWI (41°C, HWI 41 ) or warm water immersion (36°C, CON 36 ). Gastrointestinal temperature ( T gi ), hemodynamic adjustments (cardiac output [CO], mean arterial pressure [MAP], and systemic vascular resistance [SVR]), pre‐frontal cortex deoxyhemoglobin (HHb), ECG‐derived respiratory frequency, and subjective perceptual measures were tracked throughout immersion. In addition, functional markers of muscle fatigue (maximal concentric peak torque [ T peak ]) and muscle damage (late‐phase rate of force development [RFD 100–200 ]) were measured prior to EIMD (pre‐), 24 h (post‐24 h), and 48 h (post‐48 h) post‐EIMD. Results By the end of immersion, HWI 41 led to significantly higher T gi values than HWI 40 (38.8 ± 0.1 vs. 38.0°C ± 0.6°C, p < 0.001). While MAP was well maintained throughout immersion, only HWI 41 led to increased (HHb) (+4.2 ± 1.47 μM; p = 0.005) and respiratory frequency (+4.0 ± 1.21 breath.min −1 ; p = 0.032). Only HWI 41 mitigated the decline in RFD 100–200 at post‐24 h (−7.1 ± 31.8%; p = 0.63) and T peak at post‐48 h (−3.1 ± 4.3%, p = 1). Conclusion In physically active males, maintaining a core body temperature of ~25 min within the range of 38.5°C–39°C has been found to be effective in improving muscle recovery, while minimizing the risk of excessive physiological heat strain.

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Collaborators (6)

Edouard Duchesnay

Head of GAIA Laboratory, Research Director, Prof

NeuroSpin, CEA, Paris-Saclay University

FRANCE
View details

Benoît LOUVET

University of Rouen

FRANCE
View details

Guillaume Costalat

A/Prof

Université de Picardie Jules Verne

FRANCE
View details

Gillian M. C. Renshaw

Griffith University

AUSTRALIA
View details

Damien Femenias

Professeur des universités

University of Rouen

FRANCE
View details

Antonis Elia

Assistant Professor

Karolinska Institutet

SWEDEN
View details