Leonard I. Wiebe

Most antiviral and anticancer nucleosides are prodrugs that require stepwise phosphorylation to their triphosphate nucleotide form for biological activity. Monophosphorylation may be rate-limiting, and the nucleotides may be unstable and poorly internalized by target cells. Effective targeting and delivery systems for nucleoside drugs, including oligonucleotides used in molecular therapeutics, could augment their efficacy. The development of a carrier designed to effect selective transmembrane internalization of nucleotides via the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPr) is now reported. In this work, the polycationic, polygalactosyl drug delivery carrier heptakis[6-amino-6-deoxy-2-O-(3-(1-thio-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-propyl)]-β-cyclodextrin hepta-acetate salt (GCyDAc), potentially a bifunctional carrier of (poly)nucleotides, was modeled by molecular docking in silico as an ASGPr-ligand, then synthesized for testing. The antivirals arabinosyl adenine (araA, vidarabine, an early generation antiviral nucleoside), arabinosyl adenine 5′-monophosphate (araAMP), and 12-mer-araAMP (p-araAMP) were selected for individual formulation with GCyDAc to develop this concept. Experimentally, beta cyclodextrin was decorated with seven protonated amino substituents on the primary face, and seven thiogalactose residues on its secondary face. AraA, araAMP, and p-araAMP were individually complexed with GCyDAc and complex formation for each drug was confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Finally, the free drugs and their GCyDAc complexes were evaluated for antiviral activity using ASGPr-expressing HepAD38 cells in cell culture. In this model, araA, araAMP, and p-araAMP showed relative antiviral potencies of 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, respectively. In comparison, GCyDAc-complexes of araA, araAMP, and p-araAMP were 2.5, 1.3, and 1.2 times more effective than non-complexed araA in suppressing viral DNA production. The antiviral potencies of these complexes were minimally supportive of the hypothesis that ASGPr-targeted, CyD-based charge-association complexation of nucleosides and nucleotides could effectively enhance antiviral efficacy. GCyDAc was non-toxic to mammalian cells in cell culture, as determined using the MTS proliferation assay.

Cellular adaptations to hypoxia promote resistance to ionizing radiation (IR). This presents a challenge for treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) that relies heavily on radiotherapy. Standard radiosensitizers often fail to reach diffusion-restricted hypoxic cells, whereas nitroimidazoles (NIs) [such as iodoazomycin arabinofuranoside (IAZA) and fluoroazomycin arabinofuranoside (FAZA)] can preferentially accumulate in hypoxic tumours. Here, we explored if the hypoxia-selective uptake of IAZA and FAZA could be harnessed to make HNC cells (FaDu) susceptible to radiation therapy. Cellular response to treatment was assessed through clonogenic survival assays and by monitoring DNA damage (immunofluorescence staining of DNA damage markers, γ-H2AX and p-53BP1, and by alkaline comet assay). The effects of reoxygenation were studied using the following assays: estimation of nucleoside incorporation to assess DNA synthesis rates, immunofluorescent imaging of chromatin-associated replication protein A as a marker of replication stress, and quantification of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Both IAZA and FAZA sensitized hypoxic HNC cells to IR, albeit the former is a better radiosensitizer. Radiosensitization by these compounds was restricted only to hypoxic cells, with no visible effects under normoxia. IAZA and FAZA impaired cellular adaptation to reoxygenation; high levels of ROS, reduced DNA synthesis capacity, and signs of replication stress were observed in reoxygenated cells. Overall, our data highlight the therapeutic potentials of IAZA and FAZA for targeting hypoxic HNC cells and provide rationale for future preclinical studies.