Manuel Lopes-Lima

The basic knowledge of freshwater bivalves in the Unionida in some regions of the world is still limited, hindering potential conservation efforts, including in Vietnam. A subset of these mussels, the freshwater bivalve tribe Anodontini, is especially difficult to properly identify morphologically due to intraspecific shell similarity. This study aims to define the species of Anodontini in Vietnam and describe their evolutionary relationships and distributions by estimating phylogenies and analyzing collected specimens. The Anodontini are represented in Vietnam by five species divided among three genera: Sinanodonta, Cristaria, and Pletholophus. Sinanodonta woodiana, a large species complex, is represented in Vietnam by Sinanodonta jourdyi. Cristaria is confirmed to include the widespread Cristaria plicata and substantiates the validity of Cristaria truncata. Finally, Pletholophus is here recognized as distinct from Cristaria, containing two species in Vietnam, Pletholophus tenuis, and a species new to science. Our study is an important baseline for future studies on Vietnamese freshwater mussels and highlights the importance of surveys, molecular work, and taxonomic expertise to describe the biodiversity of understudied regions.

Traditional detection of aquatic invasive species via morphological identification is often time‐consuming and can require a high level of taxonomic expertise, leading to delayed mitigation responses. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection approaches of multiple species using Illumina‐based sequencing technology have been used to overcome these hindrances, but sample processing is often lengthy. More recently, portable nanopore sequencing technology has become available, which has the potential to make molecular detection of invasive species more widely accessible and substantially decrease sample turnaround times. However, nanopore‐sequenced reads have a much higher error rate than those produced by Illumina platforms, which has so far hindered the adoption of this technology. We provide a detailed laboratory protocol and bioinformatic tools (msi package) to increase the reliability of nanopore sequencing to detect invasive species, and we test its application using invasive bivalves while comparing it with Illumina‐based sequencing. We sampled water from sites with pre‐existing bivalve occurrence and abundance data, and contrasting bivalve communities, in Italy and Portugal. Samples were extracted, amplified, and sequenced by the two platforms. The mean agreement between sequencing methods was 69% and the difference between methods was nonsignificant. The lack of detections of some species at some sites could be explained by their known low abundances. This is the first reported use of MinION to detect aquatic invasive species from eDNA samples.