Manuel Rebollo-Salas
Profesor Titular de Universidad
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
About
Manuel Rebollo-Salas is a Profesor Titular de Universidad at Universidad de Sevilla in Spain. His research primarily focuses on therapeutic exercises for pain management, especially in populations with fibromyalgia and pelvic floor disorders. Recent articles include systematic reviews and randomized control trials examining interventions such as resistance training, pain neuroscience education, and the effectiveness of various therapeutic modalities for improving health outcomes.
Articles (15)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Background. Edematous fibrosclerotic panniculopathy (EFP), commonly known as cellulite, is a cosmetic concern affecting a large percentage of women. Radiofrequency diathermy (RFD) and focused ultrasound (FUS) are noninvasive treatments proposed for the reduction of EFP. Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RFD versus FUS, both combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) for the treatment of EFP in female thighs. Methods. A randomized intrasubject assessor-blind trial was conducted (NCT03474523) on 40 lower limbs of 20 women with EFP grades I, II, or III according to the Nürnberger & Müller scale. Each lower limb was randomly assigned to receive either seven RFD sessions or seven FUS sessions, both combined with IPC. Measurements were collected at baseline and post-treatment, including lower limb circumferences at different levels, weight, grade of EFP, and physical activity level. Results. Both RFD and FUS treatments, both combined with IPC, showed significant intragroup reduction in thigh circumference measurements for RFD at 15 cm ( p = 0.001 ), 20 cm ( p = 0.024 ), and midpoint ( p = 0.008 ) and for FUS at 15 cm ( p = 0.001 ), 20 cm ( p = 0.010 ), midpoint ( p = 0.008 ), 30 cm ( p = 0.020 ), and 40 cm ( p = 0.048 ). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatments. Weight did not change with treatment, and physical activity levels did not significantly affect EFP improvement. Conclusion. Both RFD and FUS, combined with IPC, were effective noninvasive methods for treating EFP. This study found that there was no significant difference between RFD and FUS in terms of efficacy in reducing EFP in the thighs. Therefore, both techniques can be used to treat EFP from a clinical perspective. Further studies with objective measurements are required to confirm these results and to guide clinical decision-making. This trial is registered with NCT03474523.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (10)
Inmaculada Villa-Del-Pino
PROFESSOR
Centro Universitario San Isidoro
María-Luisa Benítez-Lugo
Profesora Colaboradora
Universidad de Sevilla
Maria Teresa Mingo-Gómez
Profesor
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
Estanislao Gutierrez Sánchez
Profesor Asociado
Universidad de Sevilla
Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio
Universidad de Valladolid
I. M. Carmona-Barrientos
Universidad de Cádiz
Carmen Suárez-Serrano
Profesora Contratada Doctora
Universidad de Sevilla
Luis Ceballos‐Laita
-
Abel Rosales Tristancho
Universidad de Sevilla
José-Jesús Jimenez-Rejano
Profesor Contratado Doctor
Universidad de Sevilla
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.