Marcus D. Mazur

Study Design. Biomechanical study Objective. To demonstrate that robotic cervical traction can apply closed cervical traction as effectively as manual weight-and-pulley traction in extension spring and cadaveric models. Summary of Background Data. Closed cervical traction is used to reduce subaxial cervical spine dislocation injuries and to distract the intervertebral space during cervical spine surgery. Weight-and-pulley cervical traction relies on cumbersome and imprecise technology without any safeguard to prevent over-traction or weights being pulled/released inadvertently. Methods. A prototype robotic traction device was designed and manufactured by the authors with real-time tensile force measurement, ±1-lbs (5 N) force application accuracy, locking/non-backdriveable linear actuators with actuator position sensing, 200-lbs (900 N) maximum force capability, up to 20° of flexion/extension manipulation, <25-lbs (111 N) device weight, and compatibility with Gardner-Wells tongs or Mayfield head clamp. The device was tested using an extension spring model and an intact fresh cadaver specimen to assess applied and desired force over time and radiographic changes in the cervical spine as traction force increased. The cadaver was tested in manual traction initially and then robotic traction in 10-lbs (50 N) increments up to 80-lbs (355 N) to compare methods. Results. The prototype device met or exceeded all requirements. In extension spring testing, the device reached the prescribed forces of both 25-lbs (111 N) and 80-lbs (355 N) accurately and maintained the desired weight. In cadaveric testing, radiographic outcomes were equivalent between the prototype and manual weight-and-pulley traction at 80-lbs (355 N; disk space measurements within ±10% for all levels), and the device reached the desired weight within±1-lbs (5 N) of accuracy at each weight interval. Conclusion. This preliminary work demonstrates that motorized robotic cervical traction can safely and effectively apply controlled traction forces.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives To identify whether thresholds exist beyond which operative duration or age increases risks for complications among patients ≥65 years undergoing elective spine surgery. Methods Elective inpatient spine procedures unrelated to infection/trauma/tumor diagnoses in patients <65 years recorded in the 2006-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database were identified. Univariate analyses was used to compare 30 day complication rates among 5 operative duration and age-stratified groups. To quantify the risk of prolonged operative duration on complications, multivariate analyses were performed controlling for confounders. A generalized linear model was used to assess the individual and combined effect strength of age and operative duration on complication rates. Results Among 87,705 patients stratified by operative duration, 30 day complication rates rose nonlinearly as operative duration increased, with a sharp rise after 4.0-4.9 hours (28.3% at 4.0-4.9 hours, 51.7% at ≥5 hours, P < .001). Multivariate analysis found operative duration was independently associated with increased risk of overall complications (odds ratio 1.10→1.69, P < .001) and medical complications (odds ratio 1.19→1.98, P < .001). Although complication rates rose by age (all P < .001), age was not independently predictive of overall complications within any operative duration group on multivariate analysis. Operative duration had a greater effect (η 2 P = .067) than age (η 2 P = .003) on overall complication rates. Conclusions Increased operative duration was strongly associated with 30 day complication rates, particularly beyond a threshold of 5 hours. Furthermore, operative duration had a notably larger effect on overall complication rates than age.