Mariola Szulik

Background: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the most prevalent form of coronary anomaly. One variant of AAOCA is the anomalous origin of the left circumflex artery from the right sinus of Valsalva, which can be detected using cardiac computed tomography (CT). However, limited data are available regarding the natural history of this anomaly, its impact on myocardial function, and associated symptoms. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 16,680 CT exams (cardiac and chest) performed between 2015 and 2022 at our Heart Imaging Department, utilising a dual-source 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). A registry of patients with anomalous origin of the circumflex artery from the right sinus of Valsalva (RCx) was established. The study included 56 cases of RCx (0.33%). Clinical information was obtained from medical records. RCx was defined as a circumflex artery originating from the right sinus of Valsalva (type I or II) or the right coronary artery (type III). Two researchers independently reevaluated each CT exam in our study group to ensure accurate radiologic descriptions and provide additional precise radiologic information regarding the anomaly, including high-risk features. Results: Our study comprised 56 patients, with approximately equal distribution between males (n = 30, 54%) and females (n = 26, 46%), and with a median age of 59 years. Coronary heart disease (CAD) was known in 23% of patients (n = 13), while 11% (n = 6) were obese (defined as a BMI > 30 kg/m2), and 13% (n = 7) were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Only 9% of patients (n = 5) were smokers. Dyslipidemia was the most prevalent atherosclerotic risk factor, affecting approximately one third of patients (n = 17, 30%). In 14% (n = 8) of patients, heart failure was observed, while 13% (n = 7) were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Type I RCx was the most common subtype, identified in 48% of patients (n = 27) with this anomaly. Type II and Type III were found in 25% (n = 14) and 27% (n = 15) of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that RCx is frequently encountered as an incidental finding, and we did not identify a consistent clinical characteristic in all patients with this type of anomaly. Furthermore, no gender predominance was associated with RCx. The natural history of this anomaly and its clinical implications seem benign. Further research is warranted to better understand this anomaly’s natural course and clinical implications.