Martha Paisi
Has grant
Research Interests
Explore related searches
Contact this professor
Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.
Recent Grants
Grant: Close
Management of plaque in people experiencing homelessness: A feasibility study
Open Date:
Close Date:
Articles (20)
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Year:
2025
Background The term ‘care‐experienced’ refers to anyone who is currently in care or has been in care at any stage in their life. A complex interplay of factors leads to care‐experienced children and young people (CECYP) experiencing poorer oral health and access to dental care than their peers. A rapid review of the co‐production of health and social care research with vulnerable children and young people (CYP) was carried out to inform the development of a co‐produced research project exploring the oral health behaviours and access to dental services of CECYP. Here, ‘co‐production’ refers to the involvement of CYP in the planning or conduct of research with explicit roles in which they generate ideas, evidence and research outputs. Aim To learn how to meaningfully involve vulnerable CYP in the co‐production of health and social science research. Objectives To identify: Different approaches to facilitating the engagement of vulnerable CYP in co‐production of health and social science research; different activities carried out in such approaches, challenges to engaging vulnerable CYP in co‐production of health and social science research and ways to overcome them and areas of best practice in relation to research co‐production with vulnerable CYP. Search Strategy A rapid review of peer‐reviewed articles was conducted in six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, SocINDEX, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science) and grey literature to identify studies that engaged vulnerable CYP in co‐approaches to health and social research. Main Results Of 1394 documents identified in the search, 40 were included and analysed. A number of different approaches to co‐production were used in the studies. The CYP was involved in a range of activities, chiefly the development of data collection tools, data collection and dissemination. Individual challenges for CYP and researchers, practical and institutional factors and ethical considerations impacted the success of co‐production. Discussion and Conclusion Co‐production of health and social science with vulnerable CYP presents challenges to researchers and CYP calling for all to demonstrate reflexivity and awareness of biases, strengths and limitations. Used appropriately and well, co‐production offers benefits to researchers and CYP and can contribute to research that reflects the needs of vulnerable CYP. Adherence to the key principles of inclusion, safeguarding, respect and well‐being facilitates this approach. Patient and Public Contribution Members of our patient and public involvement and stakeholder groups contributed to the interpretation of the review findings. This manuscript was written together with a young care leaver, Skye Boswell, who is one of the authors. She contributed to the preparation of the manuscript, reviewing the findings and their interpretation.
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2024
Year:
2023
Year:
2023
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2022
Year:
2021
Year:
2021
Year:
2020
Year:
2020
Collaborators (11)
Tara Vassallo
Lecturer in Education (Early Childhood Studies)
University of Plymouth
Jill Shawe
-
Janine Doughty
Clinical Lecturer Dental
University of Liverpool
Robert Witton
University of Plymouth
Sandy Middleton
-
Lynne Callaghan
University of Plymouth
Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj
University of Plymouth
Jane Currie
Queensland University of Technology
Zoe Brookes
University of Plymouth
Mona Nasser
Prof. at University of Plymouth
University of Plymouth
Richard Byng
Professor of Primary Care Research
University of Plymouth
Make your next move.
Prepare your application
Review drafts before you send them.