Masaaki Higashino

Objective: Facial nerve paralysis due to parotid carcinoma is sometimes misdiagnosed as Bell’s palsy. This study aimed to compare patients with parotid carcinoma with and without accompanying facial nerve paralysis and to capture the features of patients misdiagnosed with Bell’s palsy. Methods: Among 209 patients, 42 (20%) had facial nerve paralysis. Of these 42 patients, 14 had received treatment for facial nerve paralysis without being diagnosed with parotid carcinoma (pretreatment group); the remaining 28 patients had not received any pretreatment and were diagnosed with parotid carcinoma at the initial visit to our hospital (no pretreatment group). This study compared patients with and without facial nerve paralysis and the pretreatment and no pretreatment groups. Results: The 42 patients with facial nerve paralysis had a significantly higher frequency of pain/tenderness and adhesion with surrounding tissues, significantly higher proportions of deep lobe tumors, and a significantly higher proportion of high-grade malignancy. In addition, the disease-specific and disease-free 5 year survival rates were significantly poorer in patients with than in those without facial nerve paralysis. The comparison between the pretreatment and no pretreatment groups revealed no significant differences in any factors nor survival rate. Five patients in the pretreatment group complained of palpable masses or pain/tenderness at the time of their initial treatment for paralysis. Conclusion: Patients with parotid carcinoma who present with facial nerve paralysis at the initial visit have a significantly poorer prognosis. The number of cases in the pretreatment group can be reduced by performing a detailed examination, which can potentially improve the prognosis.

Background The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing the prognosis of end‐stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to develop a more useful prognostic index. Patients and methods This retrospective observational study included 79 patients with end‐stage HNSCC. Patients were grouped by patient factors and prognostic indicators, and overall survival from the start of Best Supportive Care was compared for each group. In addition, overall survival was compared between patients with palliative prognostic index (PPI) ≥6 and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥10 and patients with PPI <6 or NLR <10. Results PPI ≥6 and NLR ≥10 were associated with significantly more frequent poor prognoses ( p = 0.01 and p = 0.002, respectively). The median survival was 32 days in cases with PPI ≥6 and NLR ≥10, and 64 days for PPI <6 or NLR <10 ( p < 0.001). Conclusion The combination of PPI and NLR is a useful indicator for predicting the prognosis of patients with end‐stage HNSCC.