Matija Gams

An extensive parametric study of the seismic response of one-storey precast buildings with horizontal cladding panels frequently used in Central Europe was conducted to analyse the panels’ influence on the overall response of buildings and to find out if the panels can be considered non-structural elements when they are attached to the main building with the connections typically used in practice in Central Europe. The studied structural system consisted of reinforced concrete columns and beams connected by dowels. Horizontal cladding panels were attached to columns using one of the most frequently used isostatic fastening systems. The top connections provided out-of-plane stability, and the bottom connections supported the panel in the vertical direction. The parametric study was preceded by extensive experimental research, including cyclic tests on connections and full-scale shaking table tests of whole buildings. The results of experiments were used to reveal the basic response mechanisms of panels and connections and to develop, validate and calibrate numerical models employed in the parametric study presented herein. Fifteen generalised structures with different masses and heights were subjected to 30 accelerograms with two peak ground acceleration (PGA) intensities of 0.3 g and 0.5 g, corresponding to significant damage and near-collapse limit states. The effects of the construction imperfections in connections, the silicon sealant panel-to-panel connections and different types of connections of the bottom panel to the foundation were analysed. The crucial parameter influencing the response was the displacement capacity of the connections, which was considerably affected by the construction imperfections and, consequently, difficult to estimate. It has been observed that in some buildings, particularly in shorter structures with smaller mass, cladding panels can have a somewhat more notable influence on the overall response. However, in general, when the considered types of connections are used, the panels can be considered as non-structural elements, which do not importantly influence the response of the main building. Owing to structural imperfections and relatively short available gaps, the failure of the considered top connections and falling of the panels is very likely in the high seismicity regions. In the most adverse cases, it can occur even in the moderate seismicity regions.

The seismic strengthening of buildings in earthquake-prone areas has been a hot topic in recent years, especially for masonry structures. Because there are so many masonry structures and because most were built before seismic codes existed, their seismic vulnerability is an unavoidable issue. Over the years, several methods for seismic strengthening of masonry piers and walls have been developed that may roughly be classified as traditional or modern. In this paper, an overview of the most commonly used and effective methods will be presented with an emphasis on modern methods based on a Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix. The advantages and disadvantages will be discussed from the point of view of usability, feasibility, and effectiveness. Finally, a comparison will be drawn between traditional and new methods based on composite materials.