Matthew Dimmock

Senior Lecturer

Kiel University
Country flagUnited Kingdom

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

About

Matthew Dimmock is a Senior Lecturer at Keele University in the United Kingdom. His research interests encompass radiographic examinations in pediatric settings, medical imaging techniques, and the effectiveness of different radiation therapies for cancer treatment. His recent publications explore topics such as diagnostic reference levels for pediatric radiography and the application of phase-contrast tomography in breast imaging.

Articles (10)

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Introduction: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are typical dose levels for medical imaging examinations for groups of standard‐sized patients or standard phantoms for broadly defined types of equipment used as a tool to aid optimisation of protection for medical exposures. Currently, there are no paediatric DRLs for conventional radiography (i.e. general X‐rays) published in Australia. The aim of this study was to establish typical radiation doses and risks that are representative of those delivered for commonly performed X‐ray projections for a 5‐year‐old/20 kg child using a 5‐year‐old anthropomorphic ‘bone fracture’ phantom in three dedicated paediatric radiology departments in Victoria. Methods: A total of 20 projection images were acquired for a standard 5‐year‐old/20 kg phantom using digital radiography X‐ray equipment. The air kerma‐area product (KAP) measured at each centre by a KAP metre, which was calibrated to a national primary standard, was considered to represent the median value for that centre for each X‐ray projection. Organ doses and effective dose were estimated using PCXMC software, and risks of radiation‐induced cancer and radiation‐induced death were calculated based on the BEIR VII report. Results: The typical doses for the individual X‐ray projections ranged from 3 mGy•cm 2 to 86 mGy•cm 2 , whilst the effective doses ranged from 0.00004 to 0.07 mSv. The radiation risks were ‘minimal’ to ‘negligible’. Conclusion: The estimation of typical radiation doses and associated risks for a 5‐year‐old/20 kg phantom study provides reference values for guidance and is a first step in assisting optimisation at other institutions until national DRLs, based on patient data from the clinical setting, are published.

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Collaborators (5)

Aung Aung Kywe Moe

Lecturer

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details

Lyndal Bugeja

Associate Professor

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details

Richard B Bassed

-

AUSTRALIA
View details

Caroline Wright

Associate Professor

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details

Kellie Knight

Adjunct Associate Professor

MONASH UNIVERSITY

AUSTRALIA
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.