Maximilian Pilz

Adaptive designs are an increasingly popular method for the adaptation of design aspects in clinical trials, such as the sample size. Scoring different adaptive designs helps to make an appropriate choice among the numerous existing adaptive design methods. Several scores have been proposed to evaluate adaptive designs. Moreover, it is possible to determine optimal two‐stage adaptive designs with respect to a customized objective score by solving a constrained optimization problem. In this paper, we use the conditional performance score by Herrmann et al. (2020) as the optimization criterion to derive optimal adaptive two‐stage designs. We investigate variations of the original performance score, for example, by assigning different weights to the score components and by incorporating prior assumptions on the effect size. We further investigate a setting where the optimization framework is extended by a global power constraint, and additional optimization of the critical value function next to the stage‐two sample size is performed. Those evaluations with respect to the sample size curves and the resulting design's performance can contribute to facilitate the score's usage in practice.