Mislav Mikuš

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined as unintentional urine leakage occurring as a consequence of increased intraabdominal pressure due to absent or weak musculus detrusor contractility. It affects postmenopausal women more often than premenopausal and is associated with quality of life (QoL) deterioration. The complex SUI etiology is generally perceived as multifactorial; however, the overall impact of environmental and genetic influences is deficiently understood. In this research report, we have disclosed the upregulation of 15 genes and the downregulation of 2 genes in the genetic etiology of SUI according to the accessible scientific literature. The analytical methods used for the analysis of gene expression in the studies investigated were immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence staining, PCR, and Western blot. In order to facilitate the interpretation of the results, we have used GeneMania, a potent software which describes genetic expression, co-expression, co-localization, and protein domain similarity. The importance of this review on the genetic pathophysiology of SUI lies in determining susceptibility for targeted genetic therapy, detecting clinical biomarkers, and other possible therapeutic advances. The prevention of SUI with the timely recognition of genetic factors may be important for avoiding invasive operative urogynecological methods.

The development of minimally invasive techniques has led to the creation of innovative alternatives in cases where traditional methods are not applicable. In modern gynecology, hysteroscopy has become the gold standard for the evaluation and treatment of intrauterine pathology. Endometrial ablation (EA) is a procedure that uses different types of energy to destroy the endometrium and is currently used as an alternative technique in cases of heavy menstrual bleeding when medical treatment has failed and uterine preservation is desired. The aim of this review was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of hysteroscopic EA as an alternative in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. A detailed computerized search of the literature was performed in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library), from 1994 to June 2022, to evaluate the outcomes in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) undergoing EA using hysteroscopic and non-hysteroscopic techniques. Only scientific publications in English were included. Twelve articles on the current use of endometrial ablation were included. Data on patient symptoms, tools used for EA, primary outcomes, and adverse events were recorded. EA should be considered an effective and safe approach in the management of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding caused by benign pathology, in whom medical treatment has failed or is contraindicated. Due to the lack of evidence, it would be interesting to determine whether EA would also have a role in the treatment of women with premalignant lesions, avoiding invasive surgical procedures or medical treatment in those patients for whom hysterectomy or the use of hormonal treatment is contraindicated.