Monica Hultcrantz

Karolinska Institutet

Sweden

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Professors in Sweden Professors in Statistics Statistics professors in Sweden

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (20)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Year:

2020

Collaborators (8)

Behnam Sadeghirad

Assistant Professor

McMaster University

CANADA

View details

Stefan Schandelmaier

University of Pecs

HUNGARY

View details

Prashanti Eachempati

University of Plymouth

UNITED KINGDOM

View details

Bada Yang

Assistant professor

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht

NETHERLANDS

View details

Ulf Jonsson

Healthcare Provision, Stockholm County

SWEDEN

View details

Mariska Leeflang

Associate professor

NETHERLANDS

View details

Matthias Briel

Adjunct Professor

McMaster University

CANADA

View details

Liang Yao

assistant professor

Nanyang Technological University

SINGAPORE

View details

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Monica Hultcrantz

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Articles (20)

GRADE Certainty Ratings: Thresholds Rather Than Categories of Contextualization (GRADE Guidance 41)

Core GRADE 7: principles for moving from evidence to recommendations and decisions.

Core GRADE 4: rating certainty of evidence-risk of bias, publication bias, and reasons for rating up certainty.

Core GRADE 5: rating certainty of evidence-assessing indirectness.

Core GRADE 6: presenting the evidence in summary of findings tables.

Rating certainty when the target threshold is the null and the point estimate is close to the null.

Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach.

Core GRADE 2: choosing the target of certainty rating and assessing imprecision.

Why Core GRADE is needed: introduction to a new series in <i>The BMJ</i>.

Core GRADE 3: rating certainty of evidence-assessing inconsistency

Internet-delivered psychological treatment as an add-on to treatment as usual for common mental disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials

GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency

GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach

GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions

GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy

GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings

GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis

Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: a GRADE concept paper

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

Collaborators (8)

Behnam Sadeghirad

Stefan Schandelmaier

Prashanti Eachempati

Bada Yang

Ulf Jonsson

Mariska Leeflang

Matthias Briel

Liang Yao

Make your next move.

Monica Hultcrantz

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Articles (20)

GRADE Certainty Ratings: Thresholds Rather Than Categories of Contextualization (GRADE Guidance 41)

Core GRADE 7: principles for moving from evidence to recommendations and decisions.

Core GRADE 4: rating certainty of evidence-risk of bias, publication bias, and reasons for rating up certainty.

Core GRADE 5: rating certainty of evidence-assessing indirectness.

Core GRADE 6: presenting the evidence in summary of findings tables.

Rating certainty when the target threshold is the null and the point estimate is close to the null.

Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach.

Core GRADE 2: choosing the target of certainty rating and assessing imprecision.

Why Core GRADE is needed: introduction to a new series in &lt;i&gt;The BMJ&lt;/i&gt;.

Core GRADE 3: rating certainty of evidence-assessing inconsistency

Internet-delivered psychological treatment as an add-on to treatment as usual for common mental disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials

GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency

GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach

GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions

GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy

GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings

GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis

Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: a GRADE concept paper

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

Collaborators (8)

Behnam Sadeghirad

Stefan Schandelmaier

Prashanti Eachempati

Bada Yang

Ulf Jonsson

Mariska Leeflang

Matthias Briel

Liang Yao

Make your next move.

Why Core GRADE is needed: introduction to a new series in <i>The BMJ</i>.