Nathan Nibbelink

Professor

University of Georgia
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

About

Dr. Nathan Nibbelink is a Professor at the University of Georgia in the United States. His research interests encompass wildlife conservation, environmental governance, and the impacts of human activities on biodiversity. Recent publications include studies on the movements of female deer in relation to hunting and the conservation of the Andean bear in Colombia. He focuses on habitat modeling and prioritization of vulnerable species, contributing valuable insights into sustainable environmental practices.

Articles (10)

Perceived risk associated with hunters can cause white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to shift their activity away from key foraging areas or alter normal movements, which are important considerations in managing hunting and its effects on a population. We studied the effects of seven firearms hunts on the movements of 20 female deer in two Wildlife Management Areas within the Chattahoochee National Forest of northern Georgia, USA, during the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 hunting seasons. Deer populations and the number of hunters in our study area have declined significantly since the 1980s. In response, hunting regulations for the 2019–2020 hunting season eliminated opportunities for harvesting female deer. To evaluate the indirect effects of antlered deer hunting on non-target female deer, we calculated 90% utilization distributions (UDs), 50% UDs, and step lengths for pre-hunt, hunt, and post-hunt periods using the dynamic Brownian bridge movement model. Data included 30 min GPS locations for 44 deer-hunt combinations. Pre-hunt 50% UDs (x− = 7.0 ha, SE = 0.4 ha) were slightly greater than both hunt (x− = 6.0 ha, SE = 0.3 ha) and post-hunt (x− = 6.0 ha, SE = 0.2 ha) 50% UDs (F = 3.84, p = 0.03). We did not detect differences in step length, nor did we detect differences in size or composition of 90% UDs, among the periods. Overall, our results suggest that the low level of hunting pressure in our study area and lack of exposure to hunters led to no biologically significant changes in female deer movements. To the extent of the findings presented in this paper, adjustments to the management of hunting in our study area do not appear to be necessary to minimize hunting-related disturbances for female deer. However, managers should continue to consider female deer behavior when evaluating future changes to hunting regulations.

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2020

Collaborators (6)

Donald R. Nelson

University of Georgia

UNITED STATES
View details

Krista Merry

Research Professional III

University of Georgia

UNITED STATES
View details

James Byers

Professor, Associate Dean

University of Georgia

UNITED STATES
View details

Susana Ferreira

Professor

University of Georgia

UNITED STATES
View details

Pete Bettinger

Professor

University of Georgia

UNITED STATES
View details

Gino J. D’Angelo

University of Georgia

UNITED STATES
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.