Neal M Williams

Professor

University of California
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (13)

Pesticide use in agricultural landscapes creates environmental contamination that is heterogenous in space and time. Mobile organisms, such as bees, are exposed to multiple contamination sources when visiting patches that vary in the amount, timing and toxicity of pesticides used. Yet, environmental risk assessments (ERA) typically fail to consider this heterogeneity, in part because of the complexities of estimating exposure to different pesticides, and subsequent risk at organism‐relevant scales. We use pesticide assays of 269 bee‐collected pollen samples to understand the spatiotemporal variability of risk across a network of 41 field sites in southern Sweden. Observed bee pesticide risk is calculated based on compound‐specific residue quantifications in pollen and standardized toxicity data. We then compare the ability of three classes of landscape‐scale variables to predict this risk: (1) landscape composition and configuration metrics, (2) landscape load based on national pesticide use data and (3) predictions from a newly developed bee pesticide exposure model. Based on use data, 10 crops account for 81% of the total risk. We detected 49 pesticide compounds in bee‐collected pollen. Although herbicides and fungicides constitute the bulk of detected pesticides, both in frequency and amount quantified, unsurprisingly, insecticides contribute the most to risk. Landscape composition and configuration metrics did not predict observed pesticide risk, and interactions with bee species indicate taxa‐dependency in predictions. Landscape load predicted observed risk consistently between taxa. Risk estimates from our exposure model were strongly predictive but only when considering realized risk (i.e., risk estimates based on prior pesticide use information). Synthesis and applications . Predicting pesticide risk based on landscape patterns could enable landscape‐scale ERA. However, simple metrics of landscape pattern, such as proportion of agricultural land, are not sufficient. We found that risk observed in bee‐collected pollen was best predicted when integrating spatialized pesticide use in the pesticide exposure model, underscoring the importance of such data for research, monitoring and mitigation. Further, we propose a guidance framework for future landscape ecotoxicological risk analyses that clarifies data needs relative to risk prediction goals.

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Collaborators (10)

Maj Rundlöf

-

SWEDEN
View details

Sarah Hollis Woodard

-

UNITED STATES
View details

Javier Gutierrez Illan

Associate Research Professor

Washington State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Georg Andersson

Lund University

SWEDEN
View details

Clara Stuligross

Assistant Professor

Kalamazoo College

UNITED STATES
View details

John Mola

Assistant Professor

Colorado State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Elizabeth E. Crone

-

UNITED STATES
View details

Jay Rosenheim

Professor

University of California, Davis

UNITED STATES
View details

Charlie Nicholson

Assistant Professor

Roger Williams University

UNITED STATES
View details

Jessica Knapp

Assistant Professor

Trinity College Dublin

IRELAND
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.