Nicola Tamassia

Has grant

Associate Professor

University of Verona
Country flag
Italy

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

LinkedIn
ORCID
Google Scholar

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Studies on the phenotypic and functional characteristics of 6-sulfo LacNAc+ dendritic cells in human tumours

Open Date: 2010-01-01

Close Date: 2012-12-01

Grant: Close

Role and plasticity of neutrophils in cancer: genetic and epigenetic approaches for better patient selection and innovative therapies

Open Date:

Close Date:

Articles (17)

Human CD34+/dim neutrophil-committed progenitors do not differentiate into neutrophil-like CXCR1+CD14+CD16− monocytes in vitro

The advent of recent cutting-edge technologies has allowed the discovery and characterization of novel progenitors of human neutrophils, including SSCloCD66b+CD15+CD11b−CD49dhiproNeu1s, SSChiCD66b+CD15+CD11b−CD49dintproNeus2s, CD66b+CD15+CD11b+CD49d+CD101−preNeus, and Lin−CD66b+CD117+CD71+eNePs. In this research field, we recently identified CD66b−CD38+CD64dimCD115−, CD34+, and CD34dim/− cells exclusively committed to the neutrophil lineage (which we renamed as CD34+ and CD34dim/− neutrophil-committed progenitors), representing the earliest neutrophil precursors identifiable and sorted by flow cytometry. Moreover, based on their differential CD34 and CD45RA expression, we could identify 4 populations of neutrophil-committed progenitors: CD34+CD45RA−/NCP1s, CD34+CD45RA+/NCP2s, CD34dim/−CD45RA+/NCP3s, and CD34dim/−CD45RA−/NCP4s. This said, a very recent study by Ikeda and coworkers (PMID: 36862552) reported that neutrophil precursors, termed either neutrophil progenitors or “early neutrophil-committed progenitors,” would generate immunosuppressive neutrophil-like CXCR1+CD14+CD16− monocytes. Hence, presuming that neutrophil progenitors/“early neutrophil-committed progenitors” correspond to neutrophil-committed progenitors, the selective neutrophil commitment that we attributed to neutrophil-committed progenitors is contradicted by Ikeda and coworkers’ article. In this study, by performing a more analytical reevaluation at the phenotypic and molecular levels of the cells generated by neutrophil-committed progenitors 2 and 4 (selected as representatives of neutrophil-committed progenitors), we categorically exclude that neutrophil-committed progenitors generate neutrophil-like CXCR1+CD14+CD16− monocytes. Rather, we provide substantial evidence indicating that the cells generated by neutrophil progenitors/“early neutrophil-committed progenitors” are neutrophilic cells at a different stage of maturation, displaying moderate levels of CD14, instead of neutrophil-like CXCR1+CD14+CD16− monocytes, as pointed by Ikeda and coworkers. Hence, the conclusion that neutrophil progenitors/“early neutrophil-committed progenitors” aberrantly differentiate into neutrophil-like monocytes derives, in our opinion, from data misinterpretation.

Year:

2023

Collaborators (9)

Francesca Sozio

Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

ITALY

Daniela Bosisio

University of Brescia

ITALY

Marco A Cassatella

University of Verona

ITALY

Silvano Sozzani

Full Professor

Sapienza University of Rome

ITALY

Odile Devergne

INSERM

FRANCE

oliviero olivieri

Full professor of Internal Medicine

University of Verona

ITALY

Nicola Martinelli

University Researcher and Assistant Professor in Internal Medicine

University of Verona

ITALY

Chiara Cavallini

ETH Zürich

SWITZERLAND

Laura Tiberio

University of Brescia

ITALY
Social connections

How do I reach out?

Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.

Meet Kite AI