Nicolas Goldaracena

Background Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the elderly population is currently not well studied. There are single‐center studies indicating that patient age should not be a barrier to LDLT, with similar outcomes compared to younger recipients. Methods Using UNOS/STAR data from 2010 to 2022 we retrospectively analyzed patients ≥70 years old receiving a living donor graft (LDLT ≥70y group) versus a deceased donor graft (DDLT ≥70y group). In addition, we compared recipients ≥70 years old undergoing LDLT versus patients 18–69 years old also undergoing LDLT. Donor and recipient baseline characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes including graft and patient survival were analyzed and compared between groups. Results Recipients in the LDLT ≥70y group showed less disease burden and spent significantly less time on the waitlist when compared to recipients in the DDLT ≥70y group (102 [49–201] days versus 170 [36–336] days) respectively; p = .004. With the exception of a longer length of stay (LOS) in the LDLT ≥70y group ( p ≤ .001), postoperative outcomes were comparable with recipients in the DDLT ≥70y group, including similar graft and patient survival rates at 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐years. When compared to younger recipients of a graft from a living donor, patients in the LDLT ≥70y group had similar post‐transplant functional status, re‐transplant rates and similar causes contributing to graft failure. However, significantly lower graft and patient survival rates were observed. Conclusion LDLT for recipients aged 70 or greater represents a faster access to transplantation in a safe and feasible manner when compared to similar‐ aged recipients undergoing DDLT.