Nir Ben‐Tal

The ConSurf web‐sever for the analysis of proteins, RNA, and DNA provides a quick and accurate estimate of the per‐site evolutionary rate among homologues. The analysis reveals functionally important regions, such as catalytic and ligand‐binding sites, which often evolve slowly. Since the last report in 2016, ConSurf has been improved in multiple ways. It now has a user‐friendly interface that makes it easier to perform the analysis and to visualize the results. Evolutionary rates are calculated based on a set of homologous sequences, collected using hidden Markov model‐based search tools, recently embedded in the pipeline. Using these, and following the removal of redundancy, ConSurf assembles a representative set of effective homologues for protein and nucleic acid queries to enable informative analysis of the evolutionary patterns. The analysis is particularly insightful when the evolutionary rates are mapped on the macromolecule structure. In this respect, the availability of AlphaFold model structures of essentially all UniProt proteins makes ConSurf particularly relevant to the research community. The UniProt ID of a query protein with an available AlphaFold model can now be used to start a calculation. Another important improvement is the Python re‐implementation of the entire computational pipeline, making it easier to maintain. This Python pipeline is now available for download as a standalone version. We demonstrate some of ConSurf's key capabilities by the analysis of caveolin‐1, the main protein of membrane invaginations called caveolae.

The emergence of novel proteins, beyond these that can be readily made by duplication and recombination of preexisting domains, is elusive. De novo emergence from random sequences is unlikely because the vast majority of random chains would not even fold, let alone function. An alternative explanation is that novel proteins emerge by duplication and fusion of pre‐existing polypeptide segments. In this case, traces of such ancient events may remain within contemporary proteins in the form of reused segments. Together with the late Dan Tawfik, we detected such similar segments, far shorter than intact protein domains, which are found in different environments. The detection of these, “bridging themes,” was based on a unique search strategy, where in addition to searching for similarity of shared fragments, so‐called “themes,” we also explicitly searched for cases in which the sequence segments before and after the theme are dissimilar (both in sequence and structure). Here, using a similar strategy, we further expanded the search and discovered almost 500 additional “bridging themes,” linking domains that are often from ancient folds. The themes, of 20 residues or more (average 53), do not retain their structure despite sharing 37% sequence identity on average. Indeed, conformation flexibility may confer an evolutionary advantage, in that it fits in multiple environments. We elaborate on two interesting themes, shared between Rossmann/Trefoil‐Plexin‐like domains and a β‐propeller‐like domain. For a Broad Audience A fundamental question in molecular evolution is how protein domains emerged. Similar segments shared between domains of seemingly distinct origins, may offer clues, as these may be remnants of the evolutionary process through which these domains emerged. However, finding such cases is difficult. Here, we expand the set of such cases which we curated previously, adding segments shared between domains that are considered ancient.