Nuno Matela

Has grant

Assistant Professor

Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon
Country flag
Portugal

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

LinkedIn
ORCID
Google Scholar

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Deep multimodal Learning for breast CAncer DETection

Open Date: 2022-01-01

Close Date: 2023-06-30

Grant: Close

Dual-ended Readout Innovative Method for Positron Emission Tomography

Open Date: 2016-06-01

Close Date: 2019-12-01

Grant: Close

Fast advanced Scintillator Timing (FAST)

Open Date: 2014-01-01

Close Date: 2018-01-01

Grant: Close

Improvement of image quality and dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis using statistical image reconstruction algorithms

Open Date: 2013-07-01

Close Date: 2015-12-01

Grant: Close

Study on European Population Doses from Medical Exposure (Dose Datamed 2)

Open Date: 2012-01-01

Close Date: 2015-01-01

Articles (17)

Brain Extraction Methods in Neonatal Brain MRI and Their Effects on Intracranial Volumes

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in assessing early brain development and injury in neonates. When using an automated volumetric analysis, brain tissue segmentation is necessary, preceded by brain extraction (BE) to remove non-brain tissue. BE remains challenging in neonatal brain MRI, and despite the existence of several methods, manual segmentation is still considered the gold standard. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess different BE methods in the MRI of preterm neonates and their effects on the estimation of intracranial volumes (ICVs). This study included twenty-two premature neonates (mean gestational age ± standard deviation: 28.4 ± 2.1 weeks) with MRI brain scans acquired at term, without detectable lesions or congenital conditions. Manual segmentation was performed for T2-weighted scans to establish reference brain masks. Four automated BE methods were used: Brain Extraction Tool (BET2); Simple Watershed Scalping (SWS); HD Brain Extraction Tool (HD-BET); and SynthStrip. Regarding segmentation metrics, HD-BET outperformed the other methods with median improvements of +0.031 (BET2), +0.002 (SWS), and +0.011 (SynthStrip) points for the dice coefficient; and −0.786 (BET2), −0.055 (SWS), and −0.124 (SynthStrip) mm for the mean surface distance. Regarding ICVs, SWS and HD-BET provided acceptable levels of agreement with manual segmentation, with mean differences of −1.42% and 2.59%, respectively.

Year:

2024

Collaborators (13)

Andre Castro

Lecturer

Instituto Politécnico de Leiria

PORTUGAL

Catarina Reis

Assistant Professor

University of Lisbon

PORTUGAL

Luis Peralta

Associate Professor

Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Hugo A. Ferreira

Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Paulo Rui Fernandes

Full Professor

Universidade de Lisboa Instituto Superior Técnico

PORTUGAL

Tânia Faria Vaz

Invited Assistant Lecturer

Instituto Politécnico do Porto Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto

PORTUGAL

Joao Carlos Leote Rebocho

Professor, Patologia aplicada à Fisiologia Clinica, Estudos em Neurofisiologia, Estudos invasivos em Neurofisiologia

Universidade de Lisboa Instituto Superior Técnico

PORTUGAL

Pedro Almeida

Assistant Professor

Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Ana Margarida Mota

Invited Assistant Professor

Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Rita Cascão

Gulbenkian Institute for Molecular Medicine

PORTUGAL

Nuno Cruz Garcia

Prof.

Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon

PORTUGAL

Claudia Faria

Invited Assistant Professor

Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Medicina

PORTUGAL

Helena Aidos

Assistant Professor

Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa

PORTUGAL
Social connections

How do I reach out?

Sign in for free to see their profile details and contact information.

Meet Kite AI