Launch week offerEnds in00h00m00s

Pearl Naa Lamley Lamptey

Has grant

Graduate Teaching Assistant (International)

University of Huddersfield
Country flagUnited Kingdom

Research Interests

ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.

Explore related searches

About

Pearl Naa Lamley Lamptey is a Graduate Teaching Assistant (International) at the University of Huddersfield, UK. Her research primarily focuses on women's health, particularly in the area of cervical screening. She recently published an article analyzing attitudes towards reducing cervical screening frequency among UK women, contributing to the discourse on healthcare practices and public health policy.

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Click to Prevent: A Workshop on Ways of Improving Cervical Health in the Digital Age - End Users

Open Date: 2024-04-01

Close Date:

Grant: Close

Click to Prevent: A Workshop on Ways of Improving Cervical Health in the Digital Age - Stakeholders

Open Date: 2024-04-01

Close Date:

Articles (1)

Objective Cervical cancer remains a significant health threat amongst women globally despite most cervical cancers being preventable through screening and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination. With the introduction of HPV testing and vaccination, evidence suggests that the frequency of cervical screening for women can be reduced. However, there is limited evidence on women's attitudes to possible changes to the cervical screening programme. This study explored attitudes, perceptions and beliefs of women in the United Kingdom (UK) regarding potential changes to the National Cervical Screening Programme. Method Forty‐four women were interviewed between November 2018 and March 2019. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. Results Most participants were opposed to any reduction in cervical screening frequency. Reasons included perceptions that disease would develop undetected, disempowerment, increased anxiety, reduced motivation to attend, and inefficient use of health care resources. Women perceived that they were ill‐informed about the reasons for the proposed change, and that access to evidence for the basis of proposed changes may persuade them to accept reduced screening frequency. Women believed that cervical screening is a test for cancer and that HPV vaccination does not provide reliable protection against cervical cancer. These beliefs suggest that women's perception that they require more information about the basis for reduced screening frequency is correct. Conclusion Any changes to cervical screening frequency need to ensure public support and trust through a robust public health initiative clearly identifying the rationale for any changes.

Year:

2023

Collaborators (1)

Susanna Kola‐Palmer

Reader

University of Huddersfield

UNITED KINGDOM
View details