Your Twin learns with you

30% off annual Pro20% off monthly Pro

Ends in00h00m00s

Philip E. Hulme

Has grant

Professor of Plant Biosecurity

Lincoln University
Country flagNew Zealand

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Recent Grants

Grant: Close

Nursery Crimes: Does the popularity and pricing of alien plant species traded in New Zealand ornamental horticulture markets determine the risk of introducing environmental weeds?

Open Date: 2021-01-01

Close Date: 2024-01-01

Grant: Close

Testing the dynamic enemy release hypothesis for invasive species

Open Date: 2011-01-01

Close Date: 2014-01-01

Articles (10)

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Year:

2025

Aim Studies investigating the determinants of plant invasions rarely examine multiple factors and often only focus on the role played by native plant species richness. By contrast, we explored how vegetation structure, landscape features and climate shape non‐native plant invasions across New Zealand in mānuka and kānuka shrublands. Location New Zealand. Method We based our analysis on 247 permanent 20 × 20‐m plots distributed across New Zealand surveyed between 2009 and 2014. We calculated native plant species richness and cumulative cover at ground, understorey and canopy tiers. We examined non‐native species richness and mean species ground cover in relation to vegetation structure (native richness and cumulative cover), landscape features (proportion of adjacent anthropogenic land cover, distance to nearest road or river) and climate. We used generalized additive models (GAM) to assess which variables had greatest importance in determining non‐native richness and mean ground cover and whether these variables had a similar effect on native species in the ground tier. Results A positive relationship between native and non‐native plant species richness was not due to their similar responses to the variables examined in this study. Higher native canopy richness resulted in lower non‐native richness and mean ground cover, whereas higher native ground richness was associated with higher native canopy richness. Non‐native richness and mean ground cover increased with the proportion of adjacent anthropogenic land cover, whereas for native richness and mean ground cover, this relationship was negative. Non‐native richness increased in drier areas, while native richness was more influenced by temperature. Main Conclusions Adjacent anthropogenic land cover seems to not only facilitate non‐native species arrival by being a source of propagules but also aids their establishment as a result of fragmentation. Our results highlight the importance of examining both cover and richness in different vegetation tiers to better understand non‐native plant invasions.

Year:

2023

Collaborators (4)

Helen Elizabeth Roy

Professor

University of Exeter

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Deah Lieurance

Asst. Professor of Invasive Species Biology and Management

Pennsylvania State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Tamara Robinson

Stellenbosch University

SOUTH AFRICA
View details

Montserrat Vilà Planella

Professor of Research

Universidad de Sevilla

SPAIN
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.