Prem B. Parajuli

Mississippi State University
Country flagUnited States

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (11)

Year:

2025

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2024

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Best management practices (BMPs) are management operations that reduce pollution and improve water quality. This study assessed the spatial variability of BMPs effectiveness within the Yazoo River Watershed (YRW) using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Two field-scale watersheds, Merigold Watershed (MW) from the Delta and Skuna River Watershed (SRW) in the Bluff Hills, were selected within the YRW. The SWAT model was calibrated and validated for monthly streamflow, and daily total suspended solids (TSS), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP). Monthly evaluated streamflow Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency indices were in the range from 0.60 to 0.86; daily evaluated TSS indices were in the range from 0.11 to 0.15, TN from 0.11 to 0.12, and TP from 0.05 to 0.26 during model calibration and validation periods. BMPs were implemented in MW and SRW to analyze the spatial variability effect on water quality. Cover crops (CC), vegetative filter strips (VFS), and a combination of VFS and CC were applied as BMP scenarios. Overall, a larger reduction in streamflow was about 15%, sediment about 26%, and nutrient loads, which was about 39% (TN) and 50% (TP), was determined in the MW, whereas in the large watershed (YRW) the reductions in streamflow, sediment, TN, and TP loads were about 4%, 5%, 30%, and 24%, respectively. Therefore, the novelty of this research is to compare the efficiency of a BMP in pollutant reduction at two different geographic scales. The results from this study could help farmers, scientific researchers, precision management planning, and implementing agencies select appropriate BMP for field-scale water resources management in minimizing sediment and nutrient quantities in surface water.

Year:

2023

Coastal ecosystems are vulnerable due to watershed sediment and nutrient loads. In this study, the hydrology and water quality of two coastal watersheds, Wolf River watershed (WRW) and Jourdan River watershed (JRW), were assessed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Model performance evaluation was performed using the coefficient of determination (R2) and the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). After model calibration and validation, the effectiveness of ponds, wetlands, riparian buffers, and their combination as best management practices (BMPs) were analyzed. Total suspended solids (TSS) was reduced by 31.15% in the pond scenario and 30.37% in the wetland in WRW. In addition, mineral phosphorous (MinP) was reduced by 11.84% and 9.63% in ponds and wetlands, respectively. Similarly, in JRW, TSS was reduced by 74.89% in ponds and 74.90% in wetlands. Likewise, ponds and wetlands reduced MinP by 8.05% and 13.40%, respectively. Among four riparian buffer scenarios, the 30 m buffer prompted the estimation of higher reductions such as TSS by 28.36% and MinP by 29.77% in WRW, whereas a 13.14% TSS and 22.89% MinP reduction in JRW. In addition, combined BMP, TSS was reduced by 30.37% and MinP by 52.09% in WRW, followed by a 74.92% reduction in TSS and 27.37% in MinP in JRW. All BMP implementations were effective in reducing TSS and MinP. This study suggests that ponds and wetlands were effective in reducing TSS and riparian buffers were effective in reducing MinP. These findings could be insightful in coastal watershed management.

Year:

2023

Year:

2023

Collaborators (4)

Dipesh Nepal

Mississippi State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Nuwan Wijewardane

Assistant Professor

Mississippi State University

UNITED STATES
View details

Ying Ouyang

USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station

UNITED STATES
View details

PADMANAVA DASH

Assistant Professor

-

UNITED STATES
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.