R. Napolitano

Country flagUnited Kingdom

Research Interests

Explore related searches

Contact this professor

Get a free first email built on one of their papers, ready for you to edit and send yourself.

Articles (11)

Objective To assess the reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of fetal biometry using a ‘focus point’ to assist the acquisition of the relevant plane. Methods This was a study of 80 women with a singleton non‐anomalous pregnancy who attended University College London Hospital, London, UK, between 18 and 37 weeks' gestation. Planes to measure head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were obtained four times by two different sonographers with different levels of experience, who were blinded to one another; the first set of images was obtained with reference to a standard image, and the second set of images was obtained using the focus point technique. The focus point was defined as a unique fetal anatomical landmark in each plane (cavum septi pellucidi for HC, two‐thirds of the umbilical vein for AC and one of the two extremities of the diaphysis for FL). Once identified, the focus point was maintained in view while the sonographer rotated the probe along three axes ( x , y , z ) to acquire the relevant plane. Sonographers were either in training or had > 3000 scans worth of experience. Intra‐ and interobserver reproducibility were assessed using Bland–Altman plots, and absolute values and percentages for mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were reported. Results Overall reproducibility was good, with all 95% LoA < 8%. Reproducibility was improved by use of the focus point compared with the standard technique for both intraobserver comparison (95% LoA, < 4% vs < 6%) and interobserver comparison (95% LoA, < 7% vs < 8%). These findings were independent of sonographer seniority and plane acquired. Conclusions Reproducibility of fetal biometry assessment is improved with use of the focus point for plane acquisition, regardless of sonographer experience. We propose that this method should be implemented in clinical practice and training programs in fetal biometry. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Year:

2024

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2022

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Year:

2021

Collaborators (10)

Peter Lindgren

Karolinska Institutet

SWEDEN
View details

tamara stampalija

-

ITALY
View details

C. Lees

-

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Ippokratis Sarris

Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer

King’s College London

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Julia Townson

Cardiff University

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

Jute Richter

University Hospitals Leuven

BELGIUM
View details

Cathrine Ebbing

-

NORWAY
View details

Jim Thornton

Professor of obstetrics and gynaecology

University of Nottingham

UNITED KINGDOM
View details

S. J. Gordijn

-

NETHERLANDS
View details

Joris van der Post

em Professor

AmsterdamUMC

NETHERLANDS
View details
ApplyKite TwinLearns as you apply

Make your next move.

Prepare your application

Review drafts before you send them.