Rebecca Davis

Recruitment of residents for research from long‐term care settings is known to be difficult. The purpose of this study was to summarize the effectiveness and cost in terms of time and dollars of recruitment methods for a cluster‐randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in long‐term care settings. This study was a retrospective, exploratory, descriptive analysis of recruitment data. After recruitment of 15 independent and assisted living communities, residents at each site were recruited to participate in the study using combinations of 12 different recruitment methods. Recruitment methods, time spent screening, and enrollment data were collected. Recruitment data were analyzed at the levels of site, research staff member, and participant. Over the study period, 279 older adults were screened and 172 enrolled from the 15 sites. Many participants were cognitively impaired. Research staff spent 39–89 h recruiting at each site and utilized an average of four different recruitment methods per site. Introductions of participants by site contacts yielded the most consented participants compared to other recruitment methods. Sites that had a dedicated recruiter utilized more recruiting methods and enrolled more participants than those without a dedicated recruiter. The cost of recruiting averaged $1490 per site and $93–$258 per enrollee (mean $144, standard deviation $58), but was more costly in larger facilities. Recruitment of older adults from long‐term care communities requires multiple methods of recruitment, skilled recruitment staff, and trust with the staff and potential participants.

Objectives: The purpose of this article is to compare three different methods to assess the complexity of a long-term care (LTC) environment for wayfinding before and after an environmental design intervention. The methods include space syntax (SS), the Wayfinding Checklist (WC), and the Tool to Assess Wayfinding Complexity (TAWC). Background: Wayfinding is important to maintain older adults’ independent functioning. The design of environments can impact wayfinding ability by providing support; this can be via building structure or by environmental design features such as signage and landmarks. Few methods or tools have been scientifically validated to assess environments for wayfinding complexity. In order to compare environments in terms of complexity and to measure the impact of interventions, valid and reliable tools are necessary. Methods: This article discusses the results of the use of three wayfinding design assessment tools using three routes in one LTC environment. The results of the three tools are discussed. Results: SS analysis could quantitatively measure the complexity of routes using integration values, which indicates connectedness. The TAWC and the WC were able to measure differences in visual field scores pre- and postenvironmental intervention. There were limitations to each tool: the lack of psychometric properties for the TAWC and the WC, and the lack of ability to measure changes in design features within visual fields with SS. Conclusions: Multiple tools to assess environments for wayfinding design may be needed in studies that test environmental interventions. Future research is needed to provide psychometric testing for the tools.