Riccardo Borroni

Background Ribociclib is approved for hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treatment, in combination with endocrine therapy. Hematological, hepatic, and cardiac adverse events (AEs) emerged from pivotal trials, but little is known about cutaneous adverse events (CAEs). Patients and Methods We report data from a retrospective cohort study of all patients with HR+/HER2− ABC treated with ribociclib at Humanitas Cancer Center between June 2017 and December 2022. We recorded clinical-pathological data, the incidence, and treatment of ribociclib-related CAEs. These were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE v5.0 classification. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. Results Thirteen of 91 patients (14.3%) experienced treatment-related CAEs (mean time to the occurrence: 3.9 months). The most frequent CAEs were eczematous dermatitis (53.8%) and maculo-papular reaction (15.4%). Itch was reported by all 13 patients. The grade was G3 in 8 cases, G2 in 4, and G1 in 1. An integrated approach based on ribociclib dose modulation and dermatological interventions (oral antihistamine, moisturized cream, topical, and/or systemic steroids) could prevent ribociclib discontinuation in most patients. At a median follow-up of 20 months, the median PFS was 13 months (range, 1-66) with a better PFS curves for patients experiencing CAEs (P = .04). Conclusion We mapped frequency and types of ribociclib-induced CAEs. An interdisciplinary management of CAEs incorporated into routine care may reduce the rate of drug discontinuation thus potentially contributing to better long-term outcomes.

A nationwide cross-sectional online survey was administered to dermatologists managing patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis across Italy to obtain real-world dermatologists’ perspectives on the impact of psoriasis and its treatment on patients’ daily lives and quality of life (QoL). A total of 91 dermatologists (aged 39.1 ± 11.2 years) completed a 31-question survey and workshop sessions were undertaken in order to identify the best management approach to achieve patient wellbeing. Social (4.2 ± 0.1), physical (4.26 ± 0.2) and mental components (4.1 ± 0.3) were rated by dermatologists as contributing to patient wellbeing to similar extents. While a high proportion (85.4%; rating of 4.3 out of 5) of dermatologists felt that they considered the QoL of patients, a lower proportion (69.6%; rating of 3.7 out of 5) felt that patients were satisfied in this regard. The psoriasis area and severity index and body surface area were the instruments most frequently used to assess the physical domain, while interviews/questions and the dermatology life quality index were used to assess social and mental domains, with only 60% of dermatologists following up on these aspects. The importance of investigating the presence of comorbidities was recognized but not always carried out by many dermatologists, (>70%), particularly for obesity and anxiety/depression. This survey identified key components contributing to barriers impacting on the QoL of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the perspective of the dermatologist.